"Why can't someone go ahead and change the rules of chess? Why can't the creators of the English language create English two-point-o?"
Discussion
Tell me you don’t understand how things work without telling me.
I mean the banks must know what their doing. They have been doing it so long!
Let's talk English-cash please..
So fucking powerful! Jack Mallers is so good!!
It’s simple: people who hold and buy bitcoin give it its value. They are free to do what they want, and if some large portion chose to they would be wiped out by it and their wealth would flow to the people who didn’t change. BCH is a great example.
All the value could go to bitcoin cash... I think this is why alt-coins are so volatile. Everyone is fleeing the coin they perceive to be failing for the one they perceive to be rising. Bitcoin isn’t necessarily different. But it is the first mover, and it actually works well, so it gets a large serving of memetic stickiness. Its open pseudoanonymity places it nicely in the current political landscape to be tolerable for those who like state power in ways that monero will never be. That gives it broader appeal. And it’s invention of a truly demand inelastic supply is almost a self fulfilling prophecy in that anyone who jumps ship must accept that they have given up on the possibility of a truly finite asset.
Super Interview danke Gigi.
Frohe Äquinox und Neumond dir.
Masterpiece 👌🏻
Nailed it!
Languages are living and evolving constantly so maybe not the best example.
But indeed a new version of Chess, with more pieces or different rules will hardly get some traction.
Thanks for sharing. Zapped
This was an epic interview