Someone earned $s and you are celebrating that why? What is the "circular economy" to which you refer? (Btw, circular looks like "closed loop" but they are not the same.)
Decentralization and censorship resistance are based, but wait until creators find out that nostr:nprofile1qqsrpl96thl42ve0gsah63ypz75uunzpgfrd0g2x8nry4ggtef6crdgpzfmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ucpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqgawaehxw309ahx7um5wghx67t0wahxgctddehx7er99e3k7mgljk58c's first note has earned him almost $1,000. A value for value based circular economy is sexy as fuck.
Discussion
i.e. you zap me. i zap nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z. vitor zaps nostr:npub1xr7t5h0l25ej73pm04zgz9afeexyzsjx67s5v0xxf2sshjn4sx6sep2gqh. and so forth. we've been playing a massive game of ping ponging sats back and forth for a couple years now.
Oh! Sort of like Change Tip booze buying back in the day. I hop on here occasionally to see how things are evolving. I still cannot get over needing to pay $ to claim BTC zaps.
2 more things since I have you here: how do I remove from my feed the profile of the self-descrining cum guzzler whose great contribution is public disgrace; and two, is style of the threading of convos specific to clients, and if so, is there one winning? I've been finding replies to me merely by accident as the @ wasn't included so I received no notification. I'd also like to be able to read entire conversations without having to jump. Thanks!
you don't need to pay money to claim zaps. you can setup a custodial lightning wallet or a cashu wallet for free and get zaps instantly. you don't have to manage channels or anything. it's super easy.
you can configure your feed however you want, but this is going to be client specific. you can try muting words, profiles, etc. i will say that this applies to threads too. some clients handle massively large threads better than others. i like threading on Damus, Coracle, Nostrudle the best.
LN or Cashu. 🤣
It is fun to see people using "sats" considering how hard I was affectionately laughed at in early 2011 when I suggested on Free Talk Live that satoshis be labeled the smallest increment of bitcoin. Nobody laughed thinking "bits" would be better as we all understood how stupid that thought was, but rather because nobody could conceive it being practical.
i would actually prefer to say bits. it makes more sense to people, imo. it's natural. sats or satoshis doesn't make sense, but whatever, i don't really mind in the grand scheme of things.
Bits have had an established meaning prior to bitcoin. And we needed a word for discussions rather than speaking in terms of millionths of a bitcoin and a H/T to the creator seemed appropriate. Are you okay with referring to 10 btc as a Finney?