I'm so tired of being right about Saylor
Discussion
Wait till you realize how wrong you are for supporting non open source HWWs
So what do *you* stand for?
I lobve Michael Saylor
Thanks for the feedback,You can now connect with me privately on simpieX Chat with the link below 👇
Going against the original purpose of #bitcoin shows his real colours. Sad, but better now than later!
IMHO, this is also (another) call to action against many developments for/with #bitcoin that will ultimately undermine its original purpose. The USD hegemonists will leave no stone unturned to prop up their unsound money & monetary system!
nostr:note1kw8emfyr40cpec7a5te230pk72hr8swl9n3enfakwn04kyx3hczs580qjf
Color me naive, but he’s prob just playing games.
Anyway, ‘digital currency’ is co-opted…like ‘crypto currency.’ Gross mouthfeel.
Bitcoin just is. DGAF. One love. ✌️
Dollars are money, bitcoin is savings. If bitcoin stays as savings forever and everybody hoards, his stack goes up for infinity.
If bitcoin becomes money, which there is still a lot of work left to achieve that, theoretically spending and saving could create an equilibrium. Potentially reducing the NGU forever narrative.
NGU forever narrative wouldn't be priced in fiat,
It would be priced in available goods & services.
NG&SU forever, Laura.
Right about what? Saylor didn't say Bitcoin isn't Money. He said it's not currency. The fact that people don't know the difference is why people think fiat is money. It isn't, it's currency without a monetary basis. Saylor is correct, read his actual quotes in full context. I think he's wrong about his classification of the dollar but no one is pointing fingers at that.
I never thought that other people would use Bitcoin in ways that don't align with MY ideals.