Fiat science
Time for another booster 😂
🫂
Discussion
my foot got stomped at training last night - we r not not going there lads 😅
Global surface temperature shows clear data. To say that this is "just" fiat science is dubious.
📠
Not disputing that. But the use of hysteric blanket and non-specific terms like ‘global warming’ to indicate something is wrong is a cult at this point.
Dude, posting this shows me how little you've made an honest assessment of this issue at all. You realize that this is *pure* claim based science right? You understand that this chart has nothing to do with measurements and has everything to do with the assumptions already built into the narrative?
There is no "human and natural drivers" thermometer man. Sorry, but this greatly lowers my confidence that you know anything about this issue.
switch on the news and floods will tell u climate change is real 📠
“The News”
😂😂😂
Here is a summary of many studies including evidence that there is a man-made part to climate change:
https://www.dw.com/en/fact-check-why-climate-change-is-real/a-62482188
I posted the graphic because I didn't want to bore you with articles. Here is a summary of many studies including evidence that there is a man-made part:
https://www.dw.com/en/fact-check-why-climate-change-is-real/a-62482188
FYI if your article starts with "fact check" it almost immediately gets put into a bracket of a group of political biased liars with about the worst track record imaginable.
Just for the future I would try to find a source that doesn't sound exactly like the mainstream, corrupt authoritarians that have used that phrase to push disgustingly bullshit propaganda for years.
- This is only a glancing observation for the sake of the strength of your argument in the future among people who don't trust the mainstream.
"A severe drought in Monterrey, Mexico; deaths after a fracture of the Marmolada glacier in Italy; an upcoming heat wave across Europe: ..."
sigh... and it literally starts with alarmist bullshit and equating local droughts to broad, long term climate warming... seriously this already just sounds like the news.
And then cyclones, also totally unrelated and alarmist crap. this is nothing but drivel. Sorry, if you want to post legitimate, honest, self-reflective scientific research, I am happy to look into it. But this is just trash journalism.
Seriously? 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
It's not just about the article itself, it's all about the studies that are mentioned in it. For example:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966/pdf
Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.
tell me you’re a climate change denier, without saying it.
I prefer the more accurate “climate scientism bullshit disrespector.”
Tell me this is about an ideology to you without telling me.
I have never denied that the climate changes, I have never denied that humans have an impact. I made it very clear where I think The Science™ amounts to political nonsense. But you wouldn't be interested I see since its just "climate change deniers" are people who believe in The Science™ and nothing else exists.
Very thoughtful and scientific of you. I'm sure you are well versed on the topic and have great knowledge.
Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966/pdf
It's not just about the article itself, it's all about the studies that are mentioned in it. For example:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966/pdf
Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature
Just history.
German government news. Do you fact check the fact checkers? 😂
It's not just about the article itself, it's all about the studies that are mentioned in it. For example:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966/pdf
Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.
Ah ok. Gotcha👍So more taxes and restrictions in order to stop the spread. The more i think about this i get the impression that it is positive if the followers of science do as they are told and stop breathing so therefore they are not emitting CO2 anymore.
A reduction of CO2 therefore makes sense and without panic, but with consistency.
We see Bitcoin as a wonderful opportunity for economic disinflation and as a promoter of renewable energy expansion. We are skeptical about purely centralized solutions - for the following reasons: dysfunctionality, false economic incentives (expansion of the money supply), possible surveillance.