Devs that create literal altcoins in the form of ecash tokens don’t have the moral high ground to say this. Some (maybe even most) of these companies might end up being shitcoin companies that will play the fiat ponzi games, but bitcoin on the balance sheet of companies is literally the early stages of hyperbitcoinisation. Let’s all remember that many early adopters of Bitcoin also didn’t hold their own keys, until Mt. Gox taught them that lesson the hard way. There’s no reason to expect different behaviour from corporations at this point.

nostr:nevent1qqsq9gr3ygatle8q3c7glwfc6lavxhq9z97rea0u0jt8cnw4lzhe28cpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wcm3dxaz

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

are you stupid, fastrobin11@primal.net?

😂

All I can say is I’m not a shitcoin dev and a grifter

And for the sake of transparency here is the wallet balance for which you shamed me for using custodial lighting. I switched it to my main Zeus wallet that I use for more serious things than zapping memes 10 sats at a time.

Unjustified criticism.

Ecash is an emerging technology, it is being very actively developed right now. As long as service provider warn users to use it only for experimental amounts, bitcoin ethics are fully taken care of.

Alts make the same claims and disclaimers. Stop being retarded.

Alts will be alts.

Bitcoiners are bitcoiners. We grok it.

Let’s be more on topic, less ad hominem.