USA, Russian, and China have noticed that they can team up and run the world with no effective opposition.

GM

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

GM 🤙

Pacific East (Mongolia, Japan, Australia) goes to China.

Europe, Central Asia, and Africa go to Russia.

North and South America, and (of course) Greenland, go to the USA.

That makes so much sense and would be so completely painless and immediate to enact, that you can't tell if I'm serious.

I'm just joking, but I am also very relieved that the EU got Russia, rather than China.

America is going to want India, but I think it ends up going to Russia. China and India low-key can't stand each other, so that's a no.

Therefore, America gets Venezuela, which is a real prize. All of that oil. 🤩

This.

Hello, fellow noticer. 👋🏻

The 21st century is weird lol

Like how the landscape of the 20th changed after ww1

🤔 there might be a minor problem with this thought. Russia and China have proved that oligarchs have less authority than governments. Who is running USA?

Deep State

It’s all Europe’s fault. It’s not rising up to the challenge and to its historic role.

They’re busy bickering amongst each other so much it even exceeds the wildest dreams of a Russian or Chinese 5th columns.

😭

No but it truly pisses me off.

A government worthy of its name will remind the commission of technocrats that they hold zero executive power in Brussels. All it takes is just someone with balls to tell von der Leyen to shut up and sit down.

Looking for someone with balls.

Let’s stay hopeful !

When Finrod EU King 👑?

You flatter me too much 😊

It is the governments that chose Ursula. Also Orban has already told her to shut up and sit down. Twice i think. Fico also.

The commision members belong to european parties etc. The structure is built up so that lobbies can have influence and countries people not. You don't need a messiah with balls. You need change

It's interesting that you mention Orban because he's managed to push back against EU policies that he doesn't like: he refuses immigrants and pays fines for these "human rights violations", but it's still more profitable for him because his country still benefits from being in the EU without the economic cost of babysitting the hoards of the turd world. He's also still acting like a gateway for Russian gas into the EU despite the sanctions. This dysfunctional situation is to his advantage.

More importantly, expecting a brave national leader is not messianic. It's the bare minimum expectation for a leader. And it's not gonna Hungary or Slovakia that will stand up the technocrats. It has to be someone from an EU powerhouse. It has to come from either France or Germany.

Orban will whore himself out to anyone, for cheap gas and free shit.

Yes he is an israeli whore. Only Hungary and USA supported the israeli war crimes.

I don't think he's very picky. Seems to go home with anyone.

I believe that France will be the change factor... again.

Still the people of other countries have to do their part.

France and UK have nukes. Germany has money.

All three have a lot of Muslims, and maybe the Muslims will think it's better under the Europeans, than the Russians.

The muslim situation can be solved in a week if we but stop tying our hands on principle.

Having principles is what makes us European, tho. We always need to justify our actions to ourselves.

I think it's a feature, not a bug.

Yes, but you have to admit that we're doing it pathologically now. What principles oblige us to take in people who openly declare their hatred for us, and that they want our demise ?

For example, it's one thing to speak out in support of Palestine and it's another to say "France will become a muslim country in the next decade and there's nothing you can do to stop it". Or that they're here to take revenge on France for perceived oppression during the colonial era.

This should have no place in polite society.

nothing polite about megalomaniacs intent on sowing discord.

The muslims doing terrorism apologia, openly declaring that they want to rape and exterminate french people, the constant aggression against innocents to settle "old colonial score", yeah that sows a lot of discord. These aren't fringe case, it's my day to day life arguing against people who say "well Charlie Hebdo and Bataclan had it coming". This should have absolutely no place here.

Our own megalomaniacs are a different problem that we can deal with separately.

I have to tell that not all muslims are a problem. For example shia muslims are quite ok.

Brother, I grew up in Lebanon under Hezbollah's dominion. They are not quite okay. They're as aggressive and as intolerant as their sunni counterpart, but they're just smarter about it, about how they achieve their goal. So they appear "quite okay"

And yes, it's not all muslims, since there are individuals are who quite okay. But these are individuals who managed to break free from the collectivist yoke that islam has, islam being a very collectivist religion by nature.

Mental independence is a Christian idea. We have a very personal God, who wants us to choose to love Him, so He gave us free will.

Everything else is more or less tribalism, that's why they have all of these complex rituals and clothing and dietary rules and etc. It's a massive tribal burden, that comes along with their religion and makes it impossible for them to adapt to other cutlures.

One reason Christianity spreads so fast is because the outer yoke is so light.

I pray all Muslims will come to understand that Christ is the resurrected Son of God, and not merely an important prophet.

That is pivotal to receiving Grace and learning to live in peace.

Yes, like we pray for all sinners. And we could still fight back against them all while upholding this prayer !

Of course.

> it's my day to day life arguing against people who say "well Charlie Hebdo and Bataclan had it coming".

😟 Horrific and against the values of the republic. No "fraternity" there.

well, the "Ripoublic" has been like a prostitute opening its legs. I would love to see France free from its republic.

also, just sayin' as i sit here in a run down old village house in the middle of nowhere, by european standards, "we" does not include me.

i can smell the cordite and charred bodies in the near future, and i don't intend to be incapable of feeding myself.

collectivist, political speech is inherently divisive and antagonistic. i'm a peaceful guy, and my preferred military strategy is:

I understand. And if it's ever up to me, I would do all in my power so that no harm ever comes near this village in the middle of nowhere.

But perhaps this is a difference in our respective temperaments as human beings: I do not wish to run away. Looking at the western world, with respect to all the rest, I see many things worth fighting for, many things worth protecting. And that includes this village of yours in the middle of nowhere.

This is my personal conviction.

Same.

I'm very much the type "the best defense is a good offense".

It's gotten me in a lot of trouble, in my life, but it's also gotten me out of a lot of trouble.

Being a sovereign country is a principle and it is enough.

I agree. Also, respect for what our ancestors built and we inherited. We shouldn't allow other people to demolish their life's work and rape their granddaughters. That is shameful.

Poor stewardship.

Germany had money in the past. Germany and UK are about to dive into deep shit. In fact, they are going to be the problem again i guess. France has a chance.

Who is controlling deep state then?

Security agencies.

Yeah, the 21st century is crazy. Things are changing so fast, it feels like we're going through a historical shift at warp speed.