cutting edge breakdown of what causes aging just dropped today on peter attias podcast. Super interesting if you like nerding out on longevity science https://peterattiamd.com/briankennedy/
Discussion
i listen to many different pods, none of which are based on health science. thanks for the recommendation👍🏾
inside the space this is pretty far from cutting edge, what were the most edge things you learned from this?
+1 on far from cutting edge.
Attia has a very centralized and myopic view on healthcare. Here’s an example: https://x.com/bitcoinand_beef/status/1808136135161287023
cc: nostr:npub1yd2h2lrwchshvm46jq7auh65tjkxmgnapkavh7tjtqq07kknupxsa980tv
those frequencies do not harm humans
I wish that were the case. I imagine you want to conclude that to justify your chronic exposure.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33917298/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30533171/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24982785/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19811395/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22005645/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15121512/
nostr:npub1vyrx2prp0mne8pczrcvv38ahn5wahsl8hlceeu3f3aqyvmu8zh5s7kfy55
ok? the sun does way more dna damage than any small amounts you might be able to measure from non-ionizing radiation. yet our bodies continue on since it can repair itself. I'm not losing sleep over weakly interacting EM fields.
Agree.
On EMF: https://www.emfacts.com/the-procrustean-approach/
PDF: https://www.emfacts.com/download/The_Procrustean_Approach.pdf
“This thesis contends that, rather than taking a precautionary approach, Western standard setting organisations have actually followed what can best be described as a Procrustean approach. This approach consists of cutting off from consideration scientific data that does not conform to their bed of knowledge. Such an approach can be considered just as inimical to public health protection as was Procrustes’ mythical bed for the public of his time.”
what is more cutting edge then this?
I thought the landscape perspective was interesting, with the thermodynamics/physics-style model of landscapes that shrink over time representing resilience. and to make a large stride would be ways to keep those hills from shrinking. never heard of that perspective before, even attia mentioned that was new to him, and he wrote a book on longevity.
brian just joined the board of a company called gero run by a physicist named peter fedichev which is where most of this context comes from.
its cool work and one of the more grounded approaches in the space.
to answer your Q of what is more cutting edge, one i am for: EMF based approaches, ex think of an MRI that can read and write to the body, and one I am less for is whole body replacement- so there are real companies out there growing clones in a vat with the forebrain knocked out and the engineering problem is how do you get the clone to maturity without it being able to navigate the world to have organs developed enough to replace with your own and some are working towards this with the intent to do a head transplant. for more on this could look up john schloendorn
Is that the morphological changes via bioelectricity manipulation idea?
mike levin’s lab mainly focuses on chemicals and mrna to alter bioelectric state of cells but generally speaking yes- this is what we work on and some other in this space but v few
very cool, where can I follow/read more about this stuff ?
mike’s blog thoughtforms.life and the associated podcast/unedited working conversation uploads are good for bioelecticity alpha.
other than that- hard to say. i go to alot of conferences and reach out to people but part of my job to stay on top of things in this space.
here’s my self plug of a recent blog on why membrane theory as we understand it is wrong / basis for the work we are doing, towards a read-write OS for biology using emfs
https://www.consciousrepository.com/p/a-fundamental-error-in-biology