Is the US insane enough to blow up a nuclear power plant in Ukraine to justify escalating their proxy war with Russia? đ¤ https://nostr.build/av/8ced78a3692128c97ba4988d96388761a95d395cce05d68085f5c548dcc5968e.mov
Discussion
Why not? They already blow up the north gas pipeline
And the bridge to Crimea..
And the dam..
These people are such childish morons.
Indeed. Itâs hard for me to understand that we in the Western world have let it slip so far. But I guess itâs all about incentives and enough time.( #bitcoinbreaksthewheel though)
"The neocons say that after Japan treacherously attacked Pearl Harbor and Hitler declared war on America, we had no choice. We were in the war, whether we wanted to be in it or not. But in fact, FDR provoked the Japanese attack because he wanted to get into to the war. J. Alfred Powell tells the story: âRobert B. Stinnett, Day of Deceit: The Truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor (New York, Free Press, 2000)
"...We must do everything we can to prevent the necon warmongers from unleashing a nuclear holocaust. Exposing the myth of World War II as the âgood warâ is a step in the right direction."
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/07/lew-rockwell/more-truth-about-world-war-ii/
I have no special knowledge, but it is far more in the interest of the RF to blow up the nuclear plant than for Ukraine or the US to do it because (1) it keeps Ukraine down significantly, with the loss of power and (2) it makes the use of a tactical nuclear weapon afterwards less of an escalation... "hey, we already have nuclear fallout so it's no big escalation".
Sure it could be done as a false flag, but I don't understand why the US would want to enter a full on nuclear war with Russia. I still have to believe both sides are trying to avoid that outcome. I could be wrong (there is evidence against me).
So I'm leaning against this being a false flag. I think it is more likely that Russia is considering it.
If you pay attention to my views on this conflict you'll know that I've often taken the other side. But I'm more interested in what I think is likely to be true than in being on a side.
The current fascists in power may truly believe the world will end in the next few years because of climate change.
If so, theyâre a death cult.
The sooner their nukes fall the sooner we reach whatever post apocalyptic utopia theyâre dying for.
Money and control. The US financial system *will* fall apart without lubrication, and everyone with influence in Washington has vested interests in maintaining that. Throw in the politics and itâs clear why the US would want this war to continue - bring NATO in and their TAM for weapons sales grows massively whilst having justification for extreme authoritarianism to hold power.
If Russia wanted to use nukes they would have already. Theyâre clearly not interested in totally destroying Ukraine, the US/EU are already holding summits carving up the rebuilding contracts (estimated $400B) - the more they destroy the more money they can give to their friends whilst claiming the moral high ground.
I know youâre not a Current Thing kinda guy but gonna have to disagree with you on this one.
Fair enough. You have thought about it.
just one thing to remember though:
Russia can activate the DEADHAND Perimeter system (my username, before I changed it to #darknostr) and it can be utilized even when the possessors of the nuclear codes, like Mr. Putin's failing health considering, or any other of the 3 who can make the decision to activate the codes are no longer around or alive. Maybe the US wants to see the Deadhand nuclear codes become active and when it does, all hell breaks lose as it's reach is far wider than the atomic bomb
From back in April:
https://twitter.com/CJlegalBeagle/status/1676426180780539907/photo/1
Reminds me of this
The fact is, US can't function without wars and where's the best place to fo that... âŹuro zone!