Pot is growing 📈
Tension is rising 🔥
Stop what you're doing 🛑
Cause there's a new buy-in 👇
Current Pot Size
💰 55,262 sats
📊 Odds Distribution
72.4% #[7] 40000 tickets
20.1% #[0] 11111 tickets
3.6% #[4] 2000 tickets
3.6% #[1] 2000 tickets
0.2% #[3] 100 tickets
0.1% #[6] 50 tickets
0.0% #[5] 1 ticket
📝 Participation Log
1. #[0]: 11111 tickets
2. #[1]: 2000 tickets
3. #[2]: 20000 tickets
4. #[3]: 100 tickets
5. #[4]: 2000 tickets
6. #[5]: 1 ticket
7. #[6]: 50 tickets
8. #[7]: 20000 tickets
/lottery 10
#[0] lnbc100n1p3lzmfdpp5ws9ajhdtt8y8625v9kqg3m2mlxqeh8m9uwgnwnnqce08megvkefqdqaxyczqmr0w36x2uneyp6xjcmtv468xcqzpgxqzz6sp5cu37yfg2zlv9dn8hfja8adkc0as94w25z77uqlg4uxdn5d5rsvlq9qyyssqdwy5gmrpnqy738kxshy7gxckuzsqv5723s65erl36kl8m3sqhwfhgrsul5upr73gpqqw3clglea9sfjpufenz0uw9h3ts8gug9me0kcpugz0vx
You're all set 🙂 Good luck 🍀
Is this auditable?
Good question!!!
Assuming it is, isn’t it as simple as ensuring that your stake is highest by the end of it?
I wondering about the rules. Do 100% of the sats from paid invoices get paid to the winner? How can participants audit the payout?
I think the operator is taking a 1% fee
from my experience, they take some for fees, but it is not much. might be a house rake too, not sure.
as far as randomness / provable verification that would be cool to see
Ahhh I see. It says winner takes 99% of pot. How do we know that the winning npubs are not controlled by the house?
Dumb question : I’m wondering how does this get auditable? Perhaps some kind of verifiable hash of a defined (open source)function + timestamp ?
it's an open standard for gambling generally. provable verification is like:
hash(nonce, server seed, client seed, timestamp) ->
get hex digest ->
convert hex to number ->
that is your random number
to verify, given your client seed you set, and server seed revealed (hidden at time of bet), you can hash it yourself and verify the number is the result
It’s above my pay grade.
