Censorship will only get worse. With AI, the real risk isn't censorship but dilution—diluting one's opinion so much that it never attracts an audience.

AIs can agree, disagree, present real and fake data, and even laugh about your opinions to publicly discredit you. And, at the nation-state level, almost everything speech-wise is fair game.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Today, Wikipedia does all of that.

I wanted to follow you but most of your content is in a weird language

devs do something

no I don't want translations

Dead internet theory - Most onlune interactions are just with bots.

I wondering if we'll have any platform without AI. Maybe that is impossible... We can't infer if any given user is human or robot.

We would need a biometric device that can generate unique id without a central database... Like a biometric device that can fingerprint you in a unique way. If you use a new device it renders the same id.

The only thing I can thing is DNA but that is so uncomfortable to even think about

AI is only a tool. The US uses calculators to work out trajectories to bomb doesn’t make calculation and evil faculty or calculating or calculators evil.

Yep, but AI can be used against the population by the people in power. And we probably won't see it until it is too late.

In Trinidad ChatGPT is Prime Minister I know. Super Agents at that level not AI anymore different class of intelligence

PSA : X and Grok has become "Pro-Semitic" lately, as some may have noticed. This is due to the passing of the new Stop Hate Act. Every day social media companies do not comply, it will result in a $5 million fine. @elonmusk has since sold X. FYI

https://bacon.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2736

uma bela referência ao Brasil