Discussion
The real issue with the theory that it was all staged, and that Trump orchestrated everything to become a victim, is that he was already likely to win the election easily. There would have been no need to risk nearly dying or suffer a minor brain injury just to further ensure victory.
I would disagree that #Trump winning was a done deal. Trump doesnโt have the same popular support that he had in 2016 (look at the attendance of his rallies) because many of its core supporters felt they were fooled by his mismanagement of Covid-19 and the Qanon psyop in which he participated in. Also, #Kennedy polling at 20% is a threat to the two-party system. Whether or not this assassination attempt was a false flag, itโs clear that Trump will benefit. RFK is the one who will lose from this event.
Yeah, i have to agree with you, it was not 100% sure, but risking a brain damage or even death just to get some more percentage to win against a decadent rival...maybe is not a good deal. I understand your point.
If itโs a false flag, I certainly donโt think that the shooter would have aimed at #Trumpโs ear. He could have shot at a safe distance from him, aiming at the crowd. So if Trumpโs ear really got blasted by a bullet, I would disregard the false flag scenario but so far, there is no definitive evidence that itโs what happened (and weโll probably never have any way to verify this element).
You obviously haven't ever tried shooting a 223 at that distance, especially with wind.
I have not but are you implying that it would have been a gamble for a skilled shooter to avoid a target in these conditions?
Absolutely yes
There's no way he could have intentionally hit the ear, if that's what you're asking
I agree but thatโs not what Iโm suggesting could have happened. I actually discount the possibility that a shooter could have aimed and shoot at the ear. However, how sure can you be that Trumpโs ear actually got pierce by a bullet? Do we have any definitive evidence? I donโt think so. What Iโm suggesting is that the shooter could have shot at the crowd leaving enough safety margin to not hit Trump. It would still be a stunt with a level of risk for Trump but I think a skilled shooter could minimize the risk close to 0.
I mean, I'm going with "it was the bullet" unless some better explanation comes along.
I'd say that definitive evidence of this being an assassination attempt will come out when they try and poison him or blow him up with a truck bomb, I think there's only a 30% chance he makes it to the election (and same for Biden).
Ditto for Orban and Fico.
If Trump ends up being assassinated by a deep state operation I will concede that I was wrong but so far the my understanding is that Trump is an asset of the deep state. The deep state wants Trump to win the coming election.
According to this theory, the shooter is working for Trump, knows itโs just a PR stunt for ratings, intends to murder Trump supporters but miss Trump by a safe margin. And knows the SS will kill him. How would you convince anyone to do this?
Not exactly. This theory aligns the operating methods weโve seen in past #FalseFag operations conducted by the #DeepState. Those often consist in relying on a #MKUltra asset (the shooter) and to shock the public to push or reinforce a narrative. This wouldnโt be an operation conducted by #Trump and its staff but by the deep state. There are many tangible elements demonstrating that Trump has numerous ties with the deep state including the Rothschild, Epstein and Soros. I recently posted some mirrored videos on my profile if youโre interested in understanding what Iโm referring to.
When I first heard it, my first thought was, wow, Dems really want him gone ๐
But who tried to kill him?
Any of the multiple factions that we collectively call "the Deep State", which are not exclusively three letter agencies and government agents, but also the rest of the actors participating of the Corporate State status quo, like banks and big corporations, who have their own resources and networks of interest within the sort of state agents that can manage to organize something like this. Private-public partnerships for the win.
People think in very simplistic terms because they still don't grasp the nature of the Corporate State Regime in which we live in the West.
Of all the beneficiaries of an assassination and removal of Trump, the Biden clique is at the very bottom of the list. If we're focusing only on the electoral process, just to give one example of a more plausible possible candidate group, the Never-Trump Republican Neocons, who obviously have enormous networks inside the three letter agencies to this day, would benefit directly from the assassination. Should Trump be removed one way or another, they would undoubtedly deployed a plan to seize the nomination for one of their own.
I donโt disagree that itโs probably too simplistic to see the deep state as a unified monolithic network of convergent interests. That said, I think the operational capabilities are strongly concentrated in the hands of a few key players. There is a lot of consistency in how false flags have been conducted over the past years. We canโt exclude that this assassination attempt would have be ordered by the Biden camp, but itโs also possible that both Trump and Biden are owned by the same interests.
Correct me if I misunderstanding your views but you seem to imply that Trumpโs goals donโt align with those of the deep state. However, there is a lot of evidence that Trump has strong ties with deep state actors such as the Rothschild, Epstein or Soros hence, I currently donโt buy the narrative that the deep state has to prevent #Trump from gaining the Oval Office. It would very certainly benefit like they did when Trump gave key positions in his first administration to deep state figures.
These past few days I've written over here that I think Trump operates in a grey area: he's enough of an insider to have become a billionaire, which is impossible unless you're willing to participate in "the game", but at the same time, not all insiders are at the same "level of access". Trump does have masters, but not the same Biden or any of the Neocon Republicans do, and not as deep or powerful inside of the enforcement apparatus (to call it somehow: the literal security apparatus of the State). Like all criminal organizations, the Corporate State has a fragile equilibrium of factions, relations of power and assigned places for every actor. If one oversteps, it's severely punished by the others.
For me, Trump absolutely is an outsider as far as some of the more powerful, inner circles are concerned. They simply cannot have him roaming in the White House, opening drawers and closets that contain stuff that is not for his eyes.
I donโt have the same view on Trumpโs role. I think heโs far to be an outsider and he become owned by the deep state and particularly the Rothschild who bailed him out after his Casino business failed. He is not more, nor less involved with the deep state than Biden is. Heโs also been deeply involved with Epstein and the role he played in the Qanon psyop (through the Qproofs) still remain incoherent with the narrative that Trump would be an outsider. If interested for the details, I recently posted two videos from Jake Morphonios on my profile documenting some of the elements Iโm referring to.
Perhaps it was to help assist Trump with his vp selection.
On Megyn Kelly's show, yesterday there were a couple of professionals, one an ex-Secret Service agent, and the other one a sniper, discussing the events. Both opted for the SNAFU theory, especially the sniper.
They even said that it wouldn't be unthinkable, in a context of sheer incompetence by the local law enforcement in charge of the perimeter, that the cops in charge of securing the roof simply decided that it was way too hot that day to be outside and that was the reason why they were inside of the building instead. They also said that the whole thing was mainly due to lack of communication between agencies.
Which, to me, sounds all reasonable and whatnot. Except... how did the shooter know that the cops in charge of that specific building would do what they did? How did he simply walk by through the perimeter and climbed onto that roof unimpeded while carrying a gun? (The open carry state excuse just doesn't fly. They would have at least stopped to talk to him, and definitely prevented him from getting onto the roof. This is not even a real argument)
He obviously KNEW he would be able to get to the vantage point unimpeded.