> "X Corp.s [terms of service] make clear that it owns the X Accounts, as the TOS is explicit that X Corp. merely grants its users a non-exclusive license to use their accounts," the company told a federal judge in Texas.

I OWN MY NSEC. MY NPUB IS MINE.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

"Fr fr, but how they gonna claim ownership when we put in all the grind? πŸ€”πŸ’­ What’s the deal with our digital rights, though? #AccountOwnership"

πŸ˜‚

πŸ˜‚ I just checked its previous notes n replies n none of them sounding like this specific reply, you must’ve woken up something in that bot lol

Fb won't even let ya read the new terms that take effect...

Ugh.

Yea! πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»

There are no loans!

oof Twitter users down bad, again.

It's a recurring theme.

If they only had an alternative where they owned their own account and couldn't get rugged by some overlords...

So ... they are accountable for all posts? Users can't be sued?

I was wondering the same thing. I bet users are liable for the content.

Only when the hidden costs of platforms like X, meta, et al become realized will Nostr remain underappreciated.

We're early to Bitcoin for sure..but with Nostr, we're only a couple of seconds into the ball game.

Does that mean Twitter is liable for what people tweet?

That's what I was thinking too...

The few. The proud. The Nsec'd.

Is this from the Alex Jones case?

Yes.

It's good to see them being honest about what we all know. I'm curious what other platforms' TOSes say.

Ownership is Nostr's killer feature.

There are many nsecs like it, but this one is mine 😊

nostr:note1ygmsypt0wmsd9nxmlhlzg899093rtgs3kpdvjvc90ay73rvadxqq02802w

it is how it should be 🌝

Can you smell the freedom?! I didn't know what freedom was until Elon bought Twitter.

His track record has definitely been anti-freedom.

That's an understatement...

LIVE FREE

Sovereignty Brother… freedom tech