You are misunderstanding who I use the terms. Please read this note.

nostr:nevent1qqsgm3n8hwjsn0f4a9kkytcjgjt39pcpv8skzt3y3s8phlkcgcfqj3qpvemhxue69uhkv6tvw3jhytnwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0dec82c33wcc8gen2wc6kz6rjxd3nyd3sdf685ertx4mngwrtwfjhyunwddnnsendvdhxxdtvwpnh26esw9jxzvp5v4ch5mfnd5ek20mzwfhkzerrv9ehg0t5wf6k2q3qv0tfjv5ahr3c260jtzdk5w48krerrnkg8fmcnc5lpguk0qda04eqxpqqqqqqzsa4ymg

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

How*

There is now how to use terms. Things mean what they mean. There no convolution to the terms proof of work and proof of stake. What we've been discussing are all real world things with mapped to actual physics.

I see the mistake I made. I should have written "the business venture of Bitcoin mining is Proof-Of-Stake". I thought the following context was enough to clarify that I am not saying that the process of hashing is Proof-Of-Stake.

I only mean that the capitalist venture of mining more and more requires capital and only capital as the only way to hash .ore is BUY the work.

Mining more proves you've put in more stake into your mining operation.

That dosen't mean it's bad or unfair.

I know what you're saying I just disagree and think you're wrong.

And that's okay. My opinion is that business ventures are working just as equally as any individual is.

Your understanding of capital vs Capital is the issue for ya, God speed.

What's the difference?