Isn't that basically the Rothbard position?
Discussion
I'm confused and reeling from this mention of Rothbard without a paragraph full of unassailable conclusions in grandiose selfserving verbosity
I don't think so. Block's position is based on the idea that if the child can survive outside of the womb then it should be illegal to abort it. Which means that eventually we would ban abortion ball together because sooner or later babies will be able to survive outside the womb at any age
To my knowledge Rothbard was against punitive measures against mothers who abort even in late stages. Based on the idea that no person is required to care for another.
I thought it was that you can always evict & the hope was that technology would continue to advance & save the evicticted children at earlier & earlier stages.
But Block often takes rather retarded positions, so maybe I am wrong.
yeah, block is a bit of an edgelord
but i also think that if the baby has a brain it has the essentials for argumentation and reason and thus should be considered to have nascent agency and thus killing them is murder
the main reason in practice why so many people abort now is to be whores, more or less, it's a very much libertine thing, not healthy for a society at all, since it is about high time preference behaviour
Except you are not killing them. They are dying because you have chosen to no longer support them. Did Mao "murder" all the people that starves to death?.... probably not....was what he did despicable?....yes
By your logic a man that starves to death on the street in front of your house is a man you "murdered"
TBH I don't really care too much about this topic. I think letting the states decide is probably a decent pragmatic solution that should(yeah right) make most people happy
there's accounts of this being part of the wrong stuff that was going on in the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, because the people were forbidden to allow them in and give them bedding and housing (for money of course) or do business with them, by their crazy laws
and since an embryo is mechanically growing out of a woman's body i think the "rent" argument carries no weight at all, because to get there a woman has to open her legs, and if it wasn't rape then she chose it and fuck that, it's murder
with many ways to prevent this occurring there is no reason for the use of the violent method to end a baby's life
it's like letting a baby into your yard that someone dumped there and not feeding them, than any other analogy, anyway... this human is otherwise without a guardian other than the mother, so the mother is kliling it, if she cuts it off from her blood supply
a moral society does not allow people to start human life and end it like this
in my opinion the right punishment for a woman getting an abortion is to give her a hysterectomy, then she can slut it up as much as she wants without getting pregnant, if she has the will to be a slut without her hormones