Scroll up. This whole conversation was about privacy and you changed the subject.

Bitcoin is not even the most widely accepted money though. USD is thats why stablecoins are the most popular globally.

If privacy is "shady" why do you want privacy for Lightning?

Yes, the market is already telling you Monero is better for privacy which is why it dominates DNMs

One thing is for sure though that Wallet of Satoshi address in your bio is giving you no privacy from them.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You should definitely stick with Monero and we should resume this conversation 15years from now.

More deflection. See ya.

You were refusing to acknowledge or try to understand his point. I don't know why you would expect him to dive further into yours and not state his original purpose for the conversation. Sounds like willfully shutting your mind off to me. You're no better than the very toxic of us bitcoiners.

If you read my responses I actually did still address their off-topic points

It wasn't MY conversation. It was the original conversation of OP: Monero vs Lightning transactional PRIVACY

Very common for Bitcoiners on here to do whenever transactional privacy comes up. I don't blame them though it's a losing battle to say otherwise. So change the subject.

Actually he was forming his point. It wasn't only about privacy. It was about his belief that Bitcoin has enough privacy plus other monetary properties that will make it more widely accepted over time, thus possibly allowing for far more private transactions in the future.

Well, I disagree that Bitcoin has enough privacy. I don't think even Super believes this but correct me if I'm wrong Super.

Also, I can't use the 'possiblies' and 'maybes' of future privacy enhancements today which is why we're using Monero.

When/if that happens I'll use it.