No, I donāt believe it is nonsense at all when a brand is holding a revenue of trillions, where motives of crime is simple to understand.
Now prove the open source brand or the ruling stands.
#main
Discussion
Then how simple it is to hold Bitcoin traders accountable, well, Internet never forgets, right?
Slight problem for your thesis:
You can never take it back once you opensource something.
Another slight problem:
If you want to claim ownership of an IP, you need to prove it in court.
Like faketoshi! š¤£
Like needlework and individual freedoms being raped systematically by machines enforcing individual tagging to breathe.
š¤·āāļø
Open source doesnāt imply free use, as little as she being dressed slutty is an invitation to rape her, as Bitcoin as a brand is not open sourced.
There is no Bitcoin brand and the software is open source. You are failing to grasp these concepts.
Prove it.
Github is all the proof you need: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin
You don't understand how open source software works and your arguments are invalid.
Doubt thatās satoshis repository, and then whether satoshis white paper holds true, and valid proof of work a different story.
Prove the validity from something when bitcoin and blockchain was published about a decade and a half ago.
Can somebody please explain open source to this tard in Barney speak?
#[0]
This hurts my brainā¦
Also intellectual property isnāt property, itās a fraudulent concept from the get go.
Fucking this! āļø
Yes!
IP laws are bullshit. Once you put an idea out there, it belongs to everyone!
Not only that. Hoppe explains very well how the only way to enforce intellectual property is by making another personās body, thought and speech subordinate to your Ip.
Itās a particularly insidious form of slavery.
No it doesnāt.
Looking forward to reading your essay disproving Hoppe and Rothbard on IP.
Thieving is not synonymous with liberty to argue Hopperās libertarian movement to be applicable.
You canāt own an idea š¤·
Itās not scarce.
In fact, to claim IP you need to claim ownership of other personās thought, words and bodies.
IP is slavery.
Beautiful.
Blockchain and create your own brand. Zap away, but Bitcoin is protected intellectual property.
Craig, is that you?
Quite certain Craig did not invent bitcoin nor blockchain, and why would craig claim it if open source and mit? Doesnāt add up, just like Eddieās story.
So who owns the term Bitcoin then?
P.S. see how ridiculous the concept of IP is? Trying to own a word. Trying to ban billions of people from speaking freely, because somebody supposedly owns their tongues.
Satoshi Nakamoto of course, who published the white paper.
A white paper is a technical proposal. Nothing more.
And intellectual property rights.
Thatās how publications work you know.
Open source. You still fail to grasp the concept.
Open source doesnāt mean having rights to violate and infringe on a brand. I donāt think thatās what open sourcing means.
What you think is irrelevant. Open source means that the source code can be copied and modified without legal recourse.
The entire fucking internet runs on open source software.
So? Even if I roll with the ridiculous concept of current ip laws, Satoshi did not register a brand, the word is widely used on common language -> cannot be protected as a brand
Doesnāt need to when publishing it, and owning the intellectual property rights, as without given permission and consent, in writing, since a commercial property, we simply may not.
Satoshi simply doesnāt have to.
LOL. So the already logically impossible ip laws are not enough, now every word is property of the first person to use it š
First person to publish it, as finding motive for thieving and corruption somehow is easier than trying to justify how slutty she was dressed when charged with rape
Sorry, it canāt be rape that word was trademarked by Epstein LLC.
Epstein?
Relevant to bitcoin how except describing how the rapists?
Guess Epstein describes the situation quite well. Happy ending is it?
About as well as your rape analogy, but I have a feeling that you are not able to understand what I mean.
To be anal about things you mean since missing is a dead end?!
And funny enough, intellectual property right donāt have an expiration date.
What is Intellectual Property?
Intellectual property (IP) refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions; literary and artistic works; designs; and symbols, names and images used in commerce.
Now, if you just scroll down a bit further you would see the different types of Ip and that most of them need active registration and all expire.
Not a question of literary rights to be discussing copyrights as copyright implies, is it?
First to publish is first to claim the intellectual properties on cyberspace too.
Ruling stands
So, if Satoshi was not the involved in the publishing on GitHub and consented to the MIT licenseā¦ why did he never oppose it?
He has plenty of time before he disappeared, since itās been on there since 2009y
How do you know that is the case?
Maybe he was gagged by those people mothering bitcoin?
Or what say you, #[7]ā? Thatās what Twitter is good at, aināt it? To gag and rape people while pedo profiteering?
Besides, just because she didnāt scream at the rapists when gagged, does it mean she consented?
Youāre so funnyā¦ satoshi was able to write to Cypherpunks from a email address to this day not traced to a person, but somehow it was censored?
And on top of that he wanted to protect a brand that he didnāt register š
Yet published research and white papers defining the protocols and bitcoin as a proof of work.
Doesnāt need to register brand as little as musicians need to register their work besides proof of publication, which blockchain and bitcoins white paper constitute as.
The Bitcoin whitepaper is truth.
My Bitcoins remain in cold storage.
Your arguments are invalid.
Oh, but he does. You are confusing copyright and brands.
And copyright he gave up freely by encouraging sharing the whitepaper explicitly in his emails.
Intellectual property rights are protected as well as brands and copyrighted material.
Bitcoin is an intellectual property as a proof of work for blockchain as a decentralized protocol.
Intellectual property rights are protected the same way, the Mafia protects your store.
But you are not only trying to argue that the Mafia business model is legit, you think it doesnāt go far enough.
Nothing you said is true according to international IP laws.
Yet binary causality is even more difficult to overcome than organic causality, but guessing explaining how temporal mechanics work and what the fallout of false cored temporal causality means, such as when having been caught stealing taking over something thatās not ours to take.
Thatās organized crime, what is the governments excuse?
Mobsters end up shot in the head on the sidewalk as history entails.
Bitcoin is not an idea but a brand.
How is the boosters going? Time for more vaccines and gagging shots with that kind of reasoning.
Not that I give a toss, but you know, nothing you can do about it when rapists argue she being dressed slutty and wanting it.
Canāt you since such an expert?
Or do we need to understand how shill scammers are talking to justify rapist robbing mannerism?
š¤
Happy to stand corrected if proven otherwise.
But blockchain technology is not the same thing as Bitcoin as a brand is it when arguing Bitcoin core, the blockchain protocol being open source as a white paper, is it?
If unable to make logical arguments, doubt gangbanging is gonna change the ruling.
@mainvolume, #Bitcoin is open sourceā”ļøš¦š
