You shouldn't have to, but the majority consent, and our system is based on who is the strongest gets their way.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You keep repeating that the majority consent. But if people were asked whether they wanted to pay their taxes this year or keep all of their income, majority of people will keep their income. This is not consent. People pay their taxes out of fear. This is actually coercion. Do not confuse the two.

I concede that you could say it is compliance. I would just say, that as you know the system is coercive and still decide to participate, it is more informed consent, although you participate under duress, you could say its not true consent.

Yeah I am doubling down and calling this coercion. It’s not consent by any means. When you don’t pay taxes, you get letters from the IRS with clear intimidation tactics. It’ll say something along the lines of you respond asap or potentially face large fines and/or imprisonment.

Imagine sending a threatening letter like this to a woman you are trying to date if she refuses to go out with you. If she goes out with you after receiving this later, she has not freely consented. She has been coerced and her interest in dating you is fraudulent.

I see that it is coercion if you view it as having no choice to pay. But you still have a choice to leave and not participate. So you are consenting because you have a choice. Choice however unsavoury to you, is still there. How about you also just do cash jobs, this is another "choice".

How about the choice to just be left alone?

Go off grid

I know there are solutions and work arounds. That’s definitely one of them. But my point is that it’s not a choice.