Sure do. Just hired one.

nostr:nevent1qqsyvt6ke6qh5mk5naeg4nkwwct4dgmgt5xtwmxz758kzhn56qa6rtspzemhxue69uhky6t5vdhkjmn9wgh8xmmrd9skce0c7mt

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

sOuRcE?????

No need to be immature. I thought we were having a nice discussion, exchanging ideas and talking about culture. I said nothing insulting or disingenuous.

Is debate simply not allowed any more?

This is the standard. Thank you for calling it out. Kindly give me a day to respond to this.

Do you mind considering that companies who have an overwhelming majority of bio pronouns will naturally have a union and topic of discussion repeatedly about the ones who don’t.

The source of truth on why someone is fired will NEVER be pronoun compliance. There is no source that says this.

You can prove very easily however in email exchanges with people getting fired from those with pronouns that cite reasons which you CAN empirically prove are not accurate.

Anyway thanks for calling out the debate best practices. I am here too for that.

I also defend my time so I’ll reply to this one time and then we can agree to disagree and move on. Cool?

Absolutely, man, take your time and protect your peace! I'm glad we share a respect for open and proper discussion. 🤙

Can’t zap you. Set up your wallet.

GM, sir.

What would you say the source of your intuition and pattern recognition is?

Is your intuition and pattern recognition up for debate or incorrect?

Perhaps I’m incorrect but those questions are as succinct as I can be on what I was given as a resource before pattern recognition and intuition took over.

Familiarization and pattern recognition of an organization’s habits of terminating non-compliant subordinates who won’t put pronouns in their email.

The reason for termination will never say the truth which is the need for power back from non compliance on a subjective morality. It won’t make it on the news unfortunately. Sadly in this case, the terminated parties have just moved on and did not want to make a stink so I felt an obligation to speak up in this method I chose.

That’s all I got for ya on this topic. Hope this was helpful. And thanks for asking.

Well thayt's good. Do you have a source for their story? News article?

What is your opinion on the firing of people who put their pronouns in their emails, and broad support for those firings? I have never met a liberal who encourages firing people for not participating in pronoun culture, but it appears that all the way up the power ladder of the right, it appears to be considered perfectly acceptable.

Some might see this as a double standard. In both cases the employee is not following directions from their employer on this topic, but you seem to be OK with one and terribly concerned about the other.