#Cancer is a spontaneous organ created by our own bodies to contain a runaway pathogenic infection.
The idea that cutting off glucose "starves cancer" is completely absurd; if our body can fuel every organ on a ketogenic diet, then it can fuel the spontaneous organ of cancer, too.
Obliterate the underlying infection, and the cancer will be disassimilated by the body.
there is several mechanisms but one of the most critical is a process called Apoptosis, cell suicide, which is intended to limit the amount of time vulnerable DNA sits in place being slowly corrupted
one of the critical pathways in apoptosis is from a process that involves iodine and fluoride and bromine both disrupt this process
it's the weakest link in the pathway but don't expect big pharma to let on about it
fluoride and bromine are two common industrial chemicals that are fueling the major part of cancer causation
glucose can't be eliminated, this is ridiculous, the liver makes it from fats and large benzene ring containing amino acids (tryptophan, tyrosine, phenylalanine)
what is different when you don't consume any form of starch or sugar (starches break into sugars during digestion starting in the saliva) is that the production of this glucose does not create as much oxidative free radicals, and these radicals are a key cause of DNA corruption in cells, as they are too small to shut out of membranes completely... and yes, this is also why heavy metals etc are involved in mitochondrial issues, the FDA and friends like to say that too much iron in the water can be dangerous to the health, but they do that because then they have an excuse to prescribe teh use of permanganate to precipitate iron out of municipal water supplies
and guess what you get when you have a shower regularly with water treated with permanganate? yeah... basically this is part of how there is so much parkinsons
and these high starch diets are fine for people with a lot of amylase genes but people whose ancestry comes from places where starches were only introduced in the last dozen generations or so don't have enough copies of the amylase gene and they end up with kidney damage and nerve damage from amylose formation as a fallback mechanism for glucose sensitivity failing
so, yeah, it's not about starving glucose out, it's about protecting the DNA, and part of that is stopping broken DNA from being replicated
these "organs" are just masses of nonfunctional cells that only consume resources and produce waste and compress other organs causing further problems and yes, of course, some of the cancer cause is also viruses, but again, same thing... if the apoptosis process is slowed down cells that have broken dna remain and replicate and grow into tumors, it's not relevant what exactly causes the failure of maintaining the DNA, or that the cells still consume glucose, it's that the cells aren't dying
Brilliant comment.
it's an interesting fact that cell membranes are an independent organism... if you provide them with the materials they grow and divide and increase in population, the DNA is basically a second organism, a bit like the symbiosis of fungus and algae in lichens
and yeah, that division process also requires mitosis, thus the name "mitochondria" - these regulate synchronising the duplication of the nucleus to allow a cell to divide and become two cells
i'm not sure if you have checked out Jack Kruse, he has a lot of very interesting info about mitochondria and is quite interesting for focusing a lot on quantum, electromagnetic and photonic interactions involved in biology
I miss reading your lengthy replies.
Good to know.
If I may add: I've heard that it can also be caused by parasitic infections. Does that information seem accurate to you based on your knowledge?
Yes.
Pathogenic infections include bacteria, parasites, viruses (if they exist), and prions.
There's some speculation and data that the mRNA vaccines caused a prion infection, resulting in "turbo cancer".
Makes sense given the way prions are hypothesized to invade every area of the body.
No, no, no. That's not the hypothesis, that's not how prions work, and it doesn't make any sense.
The turbocancer hypothesis centers around incorporation of an amplification sequence (via retrotransposon) into the human genome.
Prions are misfolded proteins that induce a chain reaction inducing normal proteins to also misfold, thereby causing neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. The brain controls nerves that go to all parts of the body so it looks like the disease "spreads everywhere", but the prions themselves are not thought to.
Creative thinking is great but you can't just make up a new disease and new pathophysiology out of thin air. That's just as assinine as "flatten the curve."
Instant follow.
Sinister bioweapons manufacturing... And to think another plandemic will ensue from the power-deranged parasitic class... I digress from the point of this post, but it makes me fume just knowing we have immense fuckery brewing just around the corner.
Sinful rulers only seek to push humanity down a spiral of destruction to appease their dark lord and desires.
#Cancer is not one disease. Blanket statements like this are neither helpful, nor accurate.
Cutting off glucose is not completely absurd. There is decent evidence in certain cancers that this helps Just like chemo, radiation, immunotherapy, and exercise are not completely absurd.
And you're totally ignoring the whole theory of mitochondrial dysfunction.
