You mean traced back to the person who I bought it from on Bisq?

So you kinda have to run a ln node with good liquidity to be able to receive a large amount of sats via robosats vs just a bitcoin node for Bisq.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No, the govt pointing at your coins and saying those were transacted using Bisq.

Maybe I'm overblowing that risk but idk.

So you would receive on wallet of satoshi for example? So you would go from nkyc sats to custodial wallet? I feel I don’t totally understand this yet

Yeah that's better than coinbase or strike & a better motivation for a LN node than zaps or anything else for that matter

.

I didn’t think about that. How is that different with Robosats? What’s different for a government entitty looking at Robosats sats vs Bisq sats?

LN isn't a public ledger

You’re right. So there would be sats that have no origin (from Robosats) and sats that can be traced (like nokyc from Bisq). If the government wanted to start enforcing kyc only, wouldnt they check both of those since theyre different from kyc sats ?

I'm totally in agreement with you that I can be wrong about this - but LN is a layer of protection that is at no trade-off cost to you unless you need larger amounts than offered.

All I’m wondering is do you think it’s safe to do robosat->WoS or Phoenix and then to signing device or do I have to run an ln node to do Robosats to ln node then close channel when the amount is a big enough utxo to then send to signing device ?

Running your own shit is always better fren.

Don't let better get in your way of leaving kyc exchanges -p

Oh I’m just asking questions about it. I guess already something like Phoenix is much better and flexible than a kyc option like WoS. Running an ln node is…something 😂

I remember when the ordinoooools clogged up the mempool. That was painful

Ordinals taking money from shitcoiners to Bitcoin miners was awesome 😎

If I remember correctly it was during the winter. So bitter for the ln node. But sweet for the other thing 😂

I think about this too. I also consider that there may be sellers on various "no kyc" platforms that are literal informants. In other words, if you use a KYC source of funds, cashapp, bank, whatever, the informant will be able to identify the source of funds and a subpoena could link your identity + any onchain data.

Great point.

Privacy will be imperfect - and it's less about circumventing government oversight & more about principles.

I'm not doing anything illegal - just want my privacy - which is my right.

The more people using Robosats the harder it is to break the privacy of individuals with honey pot tracing.

More important to use p2p exchanges than conjoining IMHO.

Remember it's also about selling on Robo as well.

We need both sides.

P2P is the whole point of this thing of ours

So there’s 3 letter agencies employees on Bisq or Robosats gathering info? That’s crazy when you think of it. We’re using this because they tax us like crazy. They then use that tax money to check on what we’re doing on those privacy focused platforms. Can’t win 🥲

We can & will win

Throwing Liquid into the mix.

Also Jam.

Fuck liquid 🤣

😳 😂 🫡

Decentralize everything, Federate this 🍆.

If you don't understand this by now idk what to tell you.