I’ve mentioned multiple times that Luke as solo maintainer is not ideal and would be great if more developers joined the review process. Developers like yourself are basically saying they know best and ignore valid criticism, this is why node runners are opting to run knots in droves. Your argument that a miner api would pop shows that the OP_RETURN limit is doing its job. All miners would have to opt into this API and then the hashers will decide where to point their hash and can boycott miners who accept spam transactions. Forcing preferences are bound to fail.
Discussion
Yep. Well said
Yep well said
No developers would work under luke. People posting here have obviously not been around that long or know who they are supporting
Given devs who don’t know Luke, why wouldn’t they work with him?
Luke is a bit rigid and has some odd quirks, but he has been pretty consistent from the very beginning. At least he has presented an alternative implementation and he does have other eyes on his code
Been here long enough to know Luke, while a bit odd, has been saying the same shit for years. The best plebs all hate core and at least run core + another implementation, frequently Knots. The core team is woke, queer, retarded and compromised. Some are working for Chainlabs which have a huge very obvious conflict of interest from a financial incentive perspective
Devs like jb55 still in denial