Bitcoin Core will be used as a mule for free, unstoppable CP/CSAM by sickos or state actors, in order to attack Bitcoin and prosecute those who knowingly allow it.

This is the attack...

Once op_return is removed, plain JPEG images (not part of multiple fragments inside scripts that need to be pieced together and decoded, but plain JPEG/GIF/MP4) will be sent through your Bitcoin HardCore node version 30+, from one paedophile to others, possibly sold (Knots runners won't touch them, ever). Your Core node will happily pass it along, providing anonymity to the criminals (or state attackers, or Epstein's old clients).

They will pay a well below market rate initially (eventually zero), and never even need to get the transaction mined - key point. The original filter that Satoshi introduced, FEES, will be effectively bypassed...

After some time, these low-fee CP/CSAM txs will be dropped by Bitcoin Core nodes, but if they don't, the sicko(s) can do an RBF of the transaction (or if they have chained them, an RBF of a single low-fee unconfirmed parent), to cancel and invalidate the transaction so they don't have to actually pay for any of the downstream higher fee large transactions.

They will have successfully used your computer to transfer and potentially sell horrible images, without paying (so forget "filters don't work, they'll get on chain anyway"), thanks you being complicit, and thanks to all the Core devs who allowed this in. And those gaslighting against us saying this is wrong.

Then public opinion will turn heavily against Bitcoiners, if it isn't bad enough now. We already know it's going to get worse as most miss out.

@adam3us has pointed out, incorrectly (I'll explain), that this attack can't work, because of some "package relay". Sounds like this is a filter to stop RBFs of a parent if there is a long chain of transactions dependent on it.

A clever idea, but it can't work, Adam. Do you know why? Because your resistance itself is a form of FILTER, and FILTERS DON'T WORK, remember? You can not use an argument against us if that same argument is used to defend yourself.

An attacker can get their cancelling RBF transaction mined by going directly to a miner. Then the scumbags get away with using your Bictoin Core node for CP/CSAM transmission - it's irrelevant whether it gets on a block or not, it doesn't need to, the paying paedophile got his images.

Ironically, filters not working is the very reason we need filters.

There are 3 solutions.

1) Bitcoin Core reverses this STUPID rushed decision, introducing completely unnecessary risk to Bitcoin.

2) We all run Knots, and it becomes the reference client.

3) We move away from Core to Knots, and maybe others will pop up, and there is no reference client, meaning fewer meaningful changes to Bitcoin become likely.

Bitcoin doesn't need changes; it needs general light maintenance, so just maintain it, don't change it!

x.com/adam3us/status…

Hmmm, the US is also pushing all their censorship agendas using pedophelia examples ... You're making me think twice about those pushing everyone to Knots now ..

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Bitcoin is a monetary network. Not a venue for free speech activism. This is not censorship. Its like saying a gym restricting people from pitching tents and having campfires is censorship. No, just not the place for that.

Understood, let me word it differently. When Govts are against Bitcoin they said it is used mainly for criminals to do illegal things.

We know that isn't true.

So when we have a Core vs Knots debate should we use the same arguments Govts do ( in this case OP used Pedophilia).

Plenty of other, more valid, examples for Core vs Knots, no need to use Govt scare tactics and broad generalizations about how Core users are helping criminals.

Totally got that. My point remains.

There is no debate in the matter to me at all. There is not a complex balance to be found between free speech and a functioning Bitcoin network.

Users are not losing any personal freedom or rights by keeping the Bitcoin network an exclusively monetary network.

With govt policies, there is a threat of losing personal freedoms when controls are put in place for “safety”. The safety vs freedom balance is a real issue with centralized governance over the lives of citizens.

This logic does not apply to a decentralized monetary network. Our freedom and lives are not controlled by the Bitcoin network. It is simply just a P2P monetary exchange network and should remain simply that.

You totally misunderstood, read carefully