02
nitesh 2y ago

The number of people using WalletOfSatoshi for zaps is a little concerning for me. Hopefully y'all are only keeping very small amounts on it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
The Daniel 🖖 2y ago

Centralization of Lightning service providers will only bring disaster. We need more and better ways to do this.

Avatar
MaxMoney21M⚡ 2y ago

Lightning is always going to have a centralizing effect. It doesn't scale to 8 billion. And that's not necessarily going to bring disaster.

I agree that we do need more & better options, of course, and Lightning does not need to be as centralized as it is right now. But it will not be as decentralized as the timechain.

02
nitesh 2y ago

I don't mind custodial as long as the population is spread around with multiple providers. Too many people using same custodial service is a bad thing. I don't even know what goes on behind the scenes at WoS, they're closed source.

Avatar
The Daniel 🖖 2y ago

I think I know.

Avatar
MaxMoney21M⚡ 2y ago

This seems very accurate.

Avatar
Rocket 2y ago

Any non-custodial accept zaps yet? Hopefully btcpayserver will work soon, but until then….

02
nitesh 2y ago

Hampus is working on it at Blixt wallet but it's more like semi-custodial.

33
kubernetes 2y ago

Are y'all not running ligess with zap support? 🤔

Avatar
Paul ⚡️ 2y ago

Muun for savings, WoS for zappings

Avatar
OpenSourceOptimist 2y ago

203 sats, I'll survive the rug pull 😅

Avatar
Michael Levin 2y ago

Hopefully LNC in more Nostr clients soon 🙏👀

02
nitesh 2y ago

LNC could be very interesting and useful here.