Man, your takes are terrible. It's like you're begging to be disliked
Discussion
Why is it a terrible take? Please explain.
I try to be accurate.
Also, are you saying we should all be trying to get everyone to like us?
Why?
Anyone with common sense understands why it's a nonsensical comparison.
I agree with many of your nostr criticisms but it's obvious you are here to provoke, your energy is not right.
Is this a short term marketing strategy for Pubky now that you got some people looking at it?
No, not everyone should like you. But it helps if someone likes you.
Tone = provocative as usual
Take = spot on tho
1) Invite codes are awesome for bootstrapping server-based businesses. I'm working out a scheme for doing this with :badge: Badges in nostr:npub18stt78efprta2el02tzgnez6ehghzgtt000v58967wvkgezjmprs0n7h7u .
2) Primal is :110percent: built for Nostr influencer larping.
Pubky (the app) has copied quite some things from the Twitter-Influencer UI playbook too, that said.
Dont mistake graph stats and views for influencer larping.
Everything in the app is designed to connect people with other people and URLs.
I get and appreciate that.
It's the focus on publicly connecting **individual** people (Follows typically) that tends to force the influencer behavior on profiles.
You seem to be trying to get profiles out of the box of "the one influencer thing they're known for" with topical tagging. That's a great step forward from the Twitter (and Primal) UX. I'm also going that route.
I think interop Communities are more promising tho. "Follow" isn't a thing in the apps we're building.
Follow is just a proxy for a data subscription and connection in our graph
Both approaches (traditional social media and invite-only communities) have their place. In nostr you can implement both. Pubky you can't even try it out.
You say that like you didnt just totally make it up, like an ignorant asshat.
Run the whole fucking stack if you want. Offer whatever terms you want.
