Beauty will save the world.
Discussion
Fiat time frames build empty soulless towers
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1274x1784&blurhash=%5ESICpHNIKPxuKOxb%7EVkCo%23xuozxug%23kC%252t7xts%3BSht7xtt7ofs%3AENkC%251jus%3Af8M%7CofoyjtjbjsEMbIt6afoLaeR*j%5Bf6ayoLayNuj%5BjFayoLay&x=dd5faef641e9b6879609b0622e76c62e89ea2057dcf5c58b40adc2d2d3f4e458
"A building is ecological" is like saying "A building is mathematical or biological, philosophical, ..."
Ecological doesn't mean sustainable, it just means "related to ecology".
Even the people that want it to mean "not harmful for the environment" or "morally good" or something like that will find that the only environment morally good beings actually want to inhabit is a beautiful one.
Luckily we have a very rich history left by builders of timeless beauty and have a lot more ground to discover.
Michael Diamant was on nostr:npub1gdu7w6l6w65qhrdeaf6eyywepwe7v7ezqtugsrxy7hl7ypjsvxksd76nak's podcast once, one of my favorite episodes.
https://saifedean.com/podcast/162-fiat-architecture-with-michael-diamant
I hate this line of reasoning because it suggests that if World Trade Center towers were just a little bit more βattractiveβ, they would still be standing today. That we would have taken more steps to protect them, which is impossible to prove
π―π―
π§‘
Tell that to Evergrande
#BITCOIN will still be beautiful in 100 years

World don't need to be saved.
It's completely fine.
We are fucked.