Beauty will save the world.

https://video.nostr.build/c5544437c5c54a8ccfa3413709ac1c3be67e3c7f09d7af36b3bfc814f77c7d14.mp4#m=video%2Fmp4&dim=320x568&blurhash=%5D%23J8IfRkbJxut7%7EqRkt7t7t7%25goJoej%5Dayxuj%5BRjWCWBj%5DofRjWBWBoKofayWBayaxofofWBaza%23j%5BofaxfQj%5Bayayayay&x=c5544437c5c54a8ccfa3413709ac1c3be67e3c7f09d7af36b3bfc814f77c7d14

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Fiat time frames build empty soulless towers

#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1274x1784&blurhash=%5ESICpHNIKPxuKOxb%7EVkCo%23xuozxug%23kC%252t7xts%3BSht7xtt7ofs%3AENkC%251jus%3Af8M%7CofoyjtjbjsEMbIt6afoLaeR*j%5Bf6ayoLayNuj%5BjFayoLay&x=dd5faef641e9b6879609b0622e76c62e89ea2057dcf5c58b40adc2d2d3f4e458

https://a.co/d/4Vonu0U

"A building is ecological" is like saying "A building is mathematical or biological, philosophical, ..."

Ecological doesn't mean sustainable, it just means "related to ecology".

Even the people that want it to mean "not harmful for the environment" or "morally good" or something like that will find that the only environment morally good beings actually want to inhabit is a beautiful one.

Luckily we have a very rich history left by builders of timeless beauty and have a lot more ground to discover.

I hate this line of reasoning because it suggests that if World Trade Center towers were just a little bit more β€œattractive”, they would still be standing today. That we would have taken more steps to protect them, which is impossible to prove

πŸ’―πŸŽ―

🧑

Tell that to Evergrande

Yahweh will take care of it

#BITCOIN will still be beautiful in 100 years

World don't need to be saved.

It's completely fine.

We are fucked.