Why is Tucker Carlson leaving Fox? After all, they make each other a lot of money. Could it be that Tucker wants to strike out on his own? Maybe, but he would be leaving a large chunk of his audience behind, maybe even most of it.

Could it be that Fox asked him to leave? It seems strange that they would. After all, Tucker is their highest-rated host, again making Fox a lot of money. So, if they did fire him, it would have to be for something serious.

Very serious. Like, 'eating babies' serious. Not that I'm saying Tucker is *known* for eating babies... no one has accused him of that, as far as I know. But he makes Fox a lot of money, enough that those suitably focused on the bottom line might overlook the occasional baby... as long as it wasn't an *important* baby. Maybe poor babies would be okay, but definitely not ones with rich parents.

Of course, nobody is saying Tucker Carlson is a baby-eating cannibal. In fact, we don't even know that he was fired. Not for certain, in any case. But it does make you wonder... how many babies would Tucker Carlson have to eat before Fox News fired him? Neither Fox nor Tucker have said, so we may never know...

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You raise some very interesting discussion points .. šŸ¤™šŸ¼

What?!? He ā€ateā€ Big Pharma for dinner last weak in his monologue. That is THE reason.

Correct, he exposed Big Pharma's influence on MSM and was sacked as a result.

Much more likely that it's the Murdochs eating the babies and he was getting close to finding out.

🤣

Or Fox was acquired by Disney and they’re purging the last of the conservatives. It’s the cabal who eats babies, but you already knew that.

I am pretty sure the current theory that his rant on the pharmacudical industry in relation to the main stream media was what put him in jeopardy. They are huge money across all Fox holdings.

Probably part of the dominium voting settlement.

That was my take as well. Tucker’s messages being key evidence.

If he doesn't tell us, should we assume it was the babies? Or would he also keep his mouth shut if it was about pharma but he accepted a handsome bribe to not talk about it?

šŸ¤”

It's all part of the script/show.

Well the guy cost them a cool 700 million for all his lies and propaganda. And he probably said he wouldn’t stop lying. So there it is.

Nice copy pasta, can't stop reading this in T**ker's voice 🤣

Tucker is much like John Oliver. A moderately talented front man for a moderately talented writing team.

If he’s just a front man, why couldn’t they control everything he says?

I didn’t say he was a puppet.

He obviously has a writing team. All people in these types of jobs do. And they have a crafted persona that’s developed over the years by themselves, their writers and the network that employs them.

You saw his private statements on how much he loathes Trump, right? That’s an example of front man vs what’s real.

Who cares. I left Twitter so I don’t have to see these kinds of deliberations about those kinds of toxic assholes (cnn and fox)

Fox 15% owned by Blackrock. Larry fink has gone woke.

He was clearly fired, the very last thing he said on the very last show he hosted was "see you Monday". Fox also cut out Dan Bongino who is also very conservative so its starting to look like Fox is attempting to moderate itself for some reason.

I also came here to comment on the timing pointing towards a firing. I was listening to Breaking Points podcast yesterday and the former legacy media hosts talked about how Fox would not have warned him because they couldn’t risk a disgruntled host going live on air.

I’m convinced!!

Def a baby eater.

You realize that Fox News just lost a $788 million defamation lawsuit that he was apparently a big part of: https://www.economist.com/united-states/2023/04/17/the-dominion-lawsuit-showed-the-limits-of-foxs-influence-over-its-audience

The simplest explanation could be they're unhappy at how much it cost them and wanted him out.