Replying to Avatar Jake Woodhouse

In a month of posting content on Nostr via nostr:nprofile1q9n8wumn8ghj7enfd36x2u3wdehhxarj9emkjmn99ah8qatzx96r2amr8p5rxdm4dp4kzafew3ehwwpjwd48smnywycrgepndcu8qd3nx36hguryvem8xdr5d56hsmt5xfehzemtxejxkeflvfex7ctyvdshxapaw3e82egprpmhxue69uhkc6t8dp6xu6twvaex2mrp0yhxxmmdqqsfnz2sqsflkatdssmeztxr90s8xrd7r07xkhfwaa6eu9zkcguljpg0va3vj I've used 33gb of storage space

It's mainly clips of the podcast

Really highlights how much heavy lifting that the likes of IG, X, & YT etc do for you

They make it so easy

But at what cost?

Well it's simple

YOU'RE THE PRODUCT!

The real world costs associated with posting all this information is handled by the social media company, in favour of incentivising more usage, but also in exchange for control

You're on their land

They can kick you off anytime

So instead, here we are on Nostr

I've happily spent just over $400 aud on an annual 100gb storage package with nostr:nprofile1q9n8wumn8ghj7enfd36x2u3wdehhxarj9emkjmn99ah8qatzx96r2amr8p5rxdm4dp4kzafew3ehwwpjwd48smnywycrgepndcu8qd3nx36hguryvem8xdr5d56hsmt5xfehzemtxejxkeflvfex7ctyvdshxapaw3e82egprpmhxue69uhkc6t8dp6xu6twvaex2mrp0yhxxmmdqqsfnz2sqsflkatdssmeztxr90s8xrd7r07xkhfwaa6eu9zkcguljpg0va3vj

Can't wait to see the creator ecosystem proliferate over here

Indeed I'd be very interested to see what investments can be made

Onwards

From the looks of it, your video dimensions and bit rate is pretty high for web viewing. It looks like most of them are 1920x1080 at 800 kbit/s = 96MB in size

I download one and compressed it to half the size 960x540 and lowered the bitrate to 300 kbit/s = 35 MB in size

https://v.nostr.build/a1VUHG7vJq7VrPZL.mp4

I have linked the 35MB compressed version. Can you tell a difference on mobile?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Thanks Logen! It still comes across well on mobile. I’ll look into this

🙏🏻

Your welcome! Thanks for the zap!

I used the app Permute on MacOS to downscale the video file. I can make a video to show you how if it would help 🫡

I agree with Logan, it will still look good on mobile at a higher compression rate, but even more accessible to people with lower bandwidths.