Not true. Andreas was good on tech and absolutely horrible on economics. There was a massive gap to fill that got filled by Austrians like saifedean and Pierre Richard etc…
Discussion
Sure there were others, but Andreas was the Guy everyone looked too
Crypto industry used a segmented marketing campaign, and split the bitcoin community into different segments that don't talk to one another
Creating distrust, confusion and disorder
It's the same tactic that compaines use to create brand loyalty across different properties in the same industry
# 👀🇧🇷🤙
Saylor's initial tweets about Bitcoin were probably the most influential in terms of economics & how one views Bitcoin.
But I'd say random plebs abusing eachother over their views outweighed any single PoV.
Thanks for abusing me brah 💗🥲🫡🤝
This is how we come to truth
Andreas was talking about everything that happened in Cyprus and how Bitcoin protects you from imflation and monetary confiscation, and that battle continues to this very day
I don't recall him every trying to change Bitcoin monetary policy
Not changing policy. Multi-coin world. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KC8aPXzfHcU
Gigi, I'm not logging into cuck tube 😂
Correct. Love Andreas but the view that every child and school class would have their own coin was not very economically literate, to put it mildly. I empathize with that view a lot though, as I was in the same boat pre-bitcoin.
His lectures on Bitcoin were incredible, because he actually explained how it worked.
Nothing price related.