TIL the lightning network prevents mining pools from censoring txs 🙄
they're not sending their best folks.
Discussion
You actually learned nothing by choice. You don't have an incentive to learn because by doing so your entire view on shitcoins would change.
So teach then mister smart guy
Why would I spend my time to teach someone who obviously rejects fundamentals of reality? I would rather just insult them and go on with my day.
we literally just started having a conversation
and all youre willing to say is "LN fixes this"
but won't say how or why.
but sure
its because *I* reject reality
and NOT because you're just an asshole
cool cool
LN is cool and I use it.
but it doesn't do what you think it does.
for starters, its already highly centralized itself and 90+% of users are using custodial LN anyway.
maybe it gets better, but that's the situation right now.
what YOU'RE doing is a pure hopium,
"this will be fixed in the next update"
You're clearly ignorant man and that's okay. Just do you rthing lol
"i have nothing relevant or interesting to say but I'll look stupid if I dont respond"
👍
you're grabbing numbers out of your ass and acting like you know things. get therapy.
that doesn't negate the privacy features at all
these "privacy features?"
https://www.voltage.cloud/blog/lightning-network-privacy-explainer
I agree with that entire article. Taproot based opens/closes are very easy to do now, nearly 2 years later though. They are not so obvious on the block explorer anymore. Further, with all that being true, lightning is still magnitudes better for privacy than on chain is.
Better than a completely transparent ledger that's audible to anybody with an internet connection?
Set the bar a little lower why don't you...
But it's true
you can *probably* get *reasonable* privacy guarantees with Ln if you jump through a bunch of hoops.
Largely because the amount of economic activity is negligible enough to where it's not being actively surveyed
That doesn't make it a privacy layer.
Because 90+% of users are normies, they won't run their own node, ever.
With taproot channels a lightning channel open looks like a regular TX on chain. Can't tell it's lightning. So how do you propose this channel open will be censored?
How that taproot adoption coming along?
Everyone who knows what Taproot is, and is running their own LN node, is using Taproot.
Exactly
thats great
IF regular users who are just making txs are also using taproot enabled addresses
They probably don’t know chainanal is monitoring/tracking the lighting network as well
lol give me a single example of a lightning node being doxxed against the will of their runner. I'll wait.
They have been at it for 4 years now…https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/lightning-network-support/
Why do you think they need to dox anyone for this to work?