I’m not saying don’t talk about bitcoin, but what I’m saying is there needs to be space for lots of communities who never want to near about bitcoin or encryption or monetary policy, etc… If you’re person who’s really in to knitting, you want to talk about knitting.
When Occupy Wallstreet started and as occupy grew, the core organizing and form of organizing was explicitly anarchist. Ideologically, an attempt to take the politics of the anti-globalization movement and make it relevant to local concerns as it were. The way of organizing was anarchist, the understanding of the problem and solutions were anarchist. Yet there was an intentional effort to NOT talk about anarchism. It was about the practice, the issues at hand, the people. Sure if you asked, people wouldn’t deny their ideology, but you didn’t join occupy because you had read political theory and decided that you were an anti-authoritarian leftist. You joined because the idea that 1% of the population shouldn’t control the economic and political system. Then in practice, you saw the politics play out and you could decide if you liked it.
If on the other hand Occupy had said, “we want to black pill you to become a true believer in the anarchist revolution and direct action.” Then a lot of people who might like the ideas and find value in participating in the movement would be turned off.
People should join and use nostr because it meets their needs, they can connect and create social space for themselves. Not because how the social software handles payments.
imma just leave this previous rant here
nostr:note1fa4q5vuedyf3e86jfc4g49882p9f6wmqcv6enpxek0psealk6k6sus9w2l
Thread collapsed
Some random thoughts on what you guys are discussing:
1. I agree that we need more than bitcoin conversations. I think this is an onboarding / discovery problem that needs to be solved. Ideally you’d sign up and be able to choose some topics to follow. Naturally this would reduce your exposure to bitcoin.
2. Nostr is and will be different things for different people and people will join for a variety of reasons not one. For some it will be the nature of the protocol. For others it may be just exploring something new and different. And for some it may actually be the payment stuff.
3. Zaps ARE a huge innovation on top of Nostr and for many will be the distinguishing factor that make it special. To say that zaps should be tucked away somewhere because it scares people off is incorrect IMO. In fact, I would argue it’s the “decentralization” talking points that scare people away. It sounds a lot like crypto / scam industry.
4. I think we’ll see different use cases and clients bring in different audiences who experience nostr differently. If @Zapstr ever comes to life, those people would have little to do with knitting or bitcoin. They’ll just stick to music and possibly general conversations. The same goes for Onlyzaps (not the hashtag but only fans clones and the likes). For these industries, how you handle payments IS the differentiator. It seems people forget these other use cases and only talk about social…
5. That’s all… give it time. Relax. Build. Talk about things other than bitcoin ;) Don’t ask people to set up a wallet. Let them explore on their own.
Also the blog platforms are really game changer.
All those gumroad and patreon like services might be replaced too.
Someone mentioned in a podcast recently, also, machine to machine exchange of messages and payment of services between them.
Yep, many possibilities! We are just very early and mature clients will exist later.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
3. no one’s arguing that zaps should be tucked away… No one is scared of zaps. 🤦♀️
the reality is one can’t set up zaps with out seeing 100 absolutely substance-less “stack sats” posts, and every profile has cryptonouns, which is redundantly dumb if every profile and note has a zap button. This effort might still be needed, if you can stomach push back, out there, but here it’s an attack on zaps.
This is just a problem of discovery. In time it’ll be solved.

Yeah or don’t mention at all.
some are talented enough evangelists that their efforts here might be useful out there, others didn’t see success out there, and have found a circular economy of evangelicalism here that makes them feel successful, but it’s not accomplishing anything except for fulfilling the bad expectations of people who were willing to put their reservations aside and peek inside
Thread collapsed
I think even talking about making money from your social media posts isn’t a great pitch for most people. Because most people read and don’t post.
…ever shrinking creator funds yada yada…
Thread collapsed
Is not always about making money. It's about assigning value to this worthless likes.
Maybe the community could create a bot service that will automatically like all your posts once you set it up via DM.
Real friends don't let friends not use Zaps.
Thread collapsed
I think for those folks who opt into #onlyzaps, Nostr clients could combine zaps and likes into one button. Afterall, it's a zap with 0 sat.
If you like something on nostr, you should repost it, so word gets around and the content has a chance to gain visibility. Since Nostr is not Twitter, it works on decentralized relays.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
I agree with all of this. I don’t want zaps tucked away. Anyone who comes to nostr is going to organically learn about zaps, so I don’t think there’s a need to make that priority number 1 right when someone gets here.
Yeah I don’t even bother bringing it up. Also got rid of my laser eyes cat pfp. We might be scaring people away with that.
He’s still pulling all the strings. I’m just the puppet. Who knows he may yank me away and make a comeback!
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Agree. Specially point 5. I welcome users I see in global, and most respond fine, but got in a situation one called me spammer and scammer when I sent instructions on how to setup zaps... I got blocked and reported.
Now you mentioned that, I understand a little more why that happened likely
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed