Anarcho-capitalists aren't utopian. We simply recognize that the only meaningful distinction between a govt & any other organization is the ability to violently maintain a monopoly & forcibly extract money from people.

Minarchist libertarians regularly make the claim that a world with no govt is utopian & that any effort at organization immediately qualifies as govt. In the words of Hayek, "The argument for liberty is not an argument against organization, which is one of the most powerful tools human reason can employ, but an argument against all exclusive, privileged, monopolistic organization, & against the use of coercion to prevent others from doing better."

Many newbie libertarians and minarchists will at the same time go as far as calling taxation theft & suggest that govt should be voluntarily funded. If they do this you actually already have them in a logical contradiction...

If a govt is voluntarily funded then it has to compete for monetary support from customers (or patrons of some sort) just like any business or charity. An organization forced to compete for supporters cannot maintain a monopoly on anything, & can quite easily go out of business. That, by definition, means it is not a govt, it is instead a business or charity providing some voluntarily supported service like any other.

Get them to agree to voluntary funding, as a way to humanely organize society, as a way to keep govt in check, as a way to ensure there is a feedback mechanism with regard to govt performance. Once you get that, everything else will eventually fall like dominoes. Anyone who believes govts should be voluntarily funded is necessarily an anarchist whether they realize it or not.

#libertarian #ancap #voluntary #voluntarism #minarchism #anarchism #capitalism #freedom #bitcoin

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You get it.

Much of the issue comes from self-labeled, identity clinging types espousing overly-simplistic an-cap rhetoric.

(That was a lot of hyphens)

Pure Ideology never survives first contact with reality.

Using anarcho-capitalism as a first principals framework is still a very good way to approach one's interactions with the world and goals to work toward.

How might one get to a libertarian society?

Should we seize the levers of power and force freedom on everyone?

Should we ask the sociopathic people who control those levers now to just give them to us?

All talk of a libertarian society assumes that 90% of people will live by the NAP. What if only 10% are willing to?

"Forcing freedom" on everyone would be an oxymoron, right? It violates the NAP.

It will probably require existing governments to collapse. Then, the survivors have to have an alternative in place, hopefully something freer than what preceded it. And I think you have to be armed and prepared to defend your newfound freedom from all of those ready to try to take it from you.

But so long as people accept force and fraud as an acceptable means of organizing society, people will continue to try to usurp authority over their fellow humans. So perhaps it is an education issue, or as we Christians say, a "heart" problem. People need to realize it is morally wrong to violate another's freedom and assert authority over them without their consent. People have to begin to follow the "Golden Rule" of treating others the way you want to be treated (i.e., respectfully, with your consent, in a beneficial manner, etc.) versus according to the "Iron Rule" of coercion and fraud, the system we currently live under.

Can we ever get there? Some don't think we will until God personally establishes His kingdom on Earth. Even then, it would be a monarchy, because realistically, humans are herd creatures, and look for someone to follow. But Christians are called to make followers of Christ Jesus and to teach people that He is king, and to this extend His kingdom and rule. As more people submit to His rule in this life, His kingdom grows and we can potentially become more free. But if it doesn't happen in this life, we can look forward to it happening in the next.

I think it's mostly a technical problem. If the 10% who want to live by the NAP can build the tools to protect themselves from the rest then basically anyone who would like to be free eventually could be. Bitcoin is one such tool, keet & nostr may be important in this fight too, 3d printed guns may play a role, energy & other things are also important... The sociopaths are destroying their own system, a big part of the game may just be out lasting them.

We already live in a sort of authoritarian version of a polycentric legal system. If we can use tech & agorism & maybe political influence at different levels to carve out bubbles of greater freedom & production then we can show the contrast between our way of life & the ever declining living standards under corrupt & fiscally irresponsible govts. Conservative states & liberal cities already do a decent job of demonstrating the insanity of govt worship. People aren't fleeing liberal cities & states by accident.

No matter what ideology people claim to support, they always work to escape the shitholes that are eventually produced by socialist policies.

Showing the contrast between a free way of life and theirs will probably result in an airstrike.

Or maybe a 3K person mob that's determined to take your stuff. It won't matter how great a marksman you are, or how much ammo you have stockpiled if you're facing those numbers.

Remember that in the Summer of George the looters were given free reign, and anyone who defended themselves had the whole legal system brought down on them.

Yes, the system is unsustainable, but a dying animal is dangerous.

So when do you think the federal govt is going to start bombing Florida & Texas?

I wouldn't recommend that liberty loving people live anywhere near a place that might contain thousands of the sort of retarded savages who can be worked into a socialist mob, but guns tend to make people scatter even when their numbers are large. The people leading the charge aren't thinking "you can't kill us all" they are thinking "I don't want to get shot." Patriotism was basically invented because self preservation naturally tends to take over in battle. A socialist mob will never be motivated by much of anything beyond basic greed & envy.

Gib me dats = grab the gats.

April 19th 1993

What was that?

Join me on Keet.io - The Psychedelic Libertarian Repository (no expiry)

pear://keet/yry5f6hctja4dwbmpfxbpngqgjp6oiz3hqtzhimcseumfusi3koaeykkdtpe7u4pkubpkt4tykmjrpknr5an9ncjnw63w711x1q8pmkeqc

This made me think of the first U.S. constitution, the Articles of Confederation. The funding of the federal government was essentially voluntary, depending on the various state governments to contribute money with no enforcement mechanism. Statists felt this was insufficient and called for a more powerful setup...