Nostr Web Client

Agreed, privacy must be the default for Zaps. We need to make this the standard in all clients now before the masses arrive

#[0]

No. The whole concept of zaps is that they are like comments or likes, but with value.

Anon zaps are the exception.

Please Login to reply.

I want sovereigns to know i find value in their work/thoughts. If ever had a reason for annon, Nostr Zaps are not my starting line.

If you zap from your main wallet, you have a giant security issue and should fix that first, before thinking about privacy.

Custodial wallets are a good solution for zaps.

Else use a Lnbits wallet on a 1 buck a month vps plus a vpn tunnel.

where to buy $12 vps ?

Total amounts in zaps can still be public if the recipient wants to, but the zap sender should be private unless they make themselves public

No. The purpose of the zap is to interact. Obfuscation of the sender by default breaks the whole concept.

Anon zaps as option is perfect.

But that’s my opinion. Go build a client that has it as a default.

That is also the purpose of the like button

As you alluded to there will be apps for both options so it will be a users choices which will keep everyone happy