“I still do not believe that you can claim the results as valid unless it’s a double blind protocol.”
And I don’t think you can justify this assertion. What are you isolating by this? Nothing.
I told you I had only uneducated expectations going into the blind trials and the results were 100% correct, and those 100% correct results contradicted my, at the time, ignorant expectations.
That’s functionally a blind trial. There is nothing to be gained from the double blind trials you are talking about.
This entire conversation has been a shit show and it’s because you don’t know how to investigate something respectfully.