Additionally to what nostr:nprofile1qqs044j5pj8jl54pdgjapkpdm9wnhttcjr2rt5tfppy2pfma9zp6g3cpremhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet59uqjvamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3dwfjkccte9ecxs6tvd9cxxunfwd6xjctwduhxxmmd9ufzexy4 said, a main point in the post is the fact that it doesnt need to even get in a block. The CSAM would be willingly broadcasted by core 30 nodes around the network before ever accuring a fee because it would be held in the mempools. There is no "pricing it out" at that point and would require a filter to get rid of. Funny enough, that already exists...

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes, I think I get this. In fact, in order to *filter* something, you have to *look for it* My node sees a provably unspendable op_return output from a TX and depending on the threshold, currently 83 bytes or less, sends TX to other nodes. But it has to *look* to see if its 83 bytes.....

What if someone shows up at your work/home and starts playing a horrible + illegal video/audio of something? Most likely people would *look* realize its terrible and throw the guy out, call the cops, shoot the guy.....

Is the person then at risk of *looking* at said illegal thing? What if its an email attachment? or an OP_Return data blob?

Seems like logic and common sense would prevail in these settings.

I agree. Intent matters. In the analogy you presented, the Core node wouldnt kick the person our of their house. They would take a picture of it on their phone so they have a copy and send it to their neighbors. And if somebody won the town raffle, the image would get displayed at townhall forever (blockchain). Sorry, I kinda had fun with that lol