Bitcoin Core will be used as a mule for free, unstoppable CP/CSAM by sickos or state actors, in order to attack Bitcoin and prosecute those who knowingly allow it.

This is the attack...

Once op_return is removed, plain JPEG images (not part of multiple fragments inside scripts that need to be pieced together and decoded, but plain JPEG/GIF/MP4) will be sent through your Bitcoin HardCore node version 30+, from one paedophile to others, possibly sold (Knots runners won't touch them, ever). Your Core node will happily pass it along, providing anonymity to the criminals (or state attackers, or Epstein's old clients).

They will pay a well below market rate initially (eventually zero), and never even need to get the transaction mined - key point. The original filter that Satoshi introduced, FEES, will be effectively bypassed...

After some time, these low-fee CP/CSAM txs will be dropped by Bitcoin Core nodes, but if they don't, the sicko(s) can do an RBF of the transaction (or if they have chained them, an RBF of a single low-fee unconfirmed parent), to cancel and invalidate the transaction so they don't have to actually pay for any of the downstream higher fee large transactions.

They will have successfully used your computer to transfer and potentially sell horrible images, without paying (so forget "filters don't work, they'll get on chain anyway"), thanks you being complicit, and thanks to all the Core devs who allowed this in. And those gaslighting against us saying this is wrong.

Then public opinion will turn heavily against Bitcoiners, if it isn't bad enough now. We already know it's going to get worse as most miss out.

@adam3us has pointed out, incorrectly (I'll explain), that this attack can't work, because of some "package relay". Sounds like this is a filter to stop RBFs of a parent if there is a long chain of transactions dependent on it.

A clever idea, but it can't work, Adam. Do you know why? Because your resistance itself is a form of FILTER, and FILTERS DON'T WORK, remember? You can not use an argument against us if that same argument is used to defend yourself.

An attacker can get their cancelling RBF transaction mined by going directly to a miner. Then the scumbags get away with using your Bictoin Core node for CP/CSAM transmission - it's irrelevant whether it gets on a block or not, it doesn't need to, the paying paedophile got his images.

Ironically, filters not working is the very reason we need filters.

There are 3 solutions.

1) Bitcoin Core reverses this STUPID rushed decision, introducing completely unnecessary risk to Bitcoin.

2) We all run Knots, and it becomes the reference client.

3) We move away from Core to Knots, and maybe others will pop up, and there is no reference client, meaning fewer meaningful changes to Bitcoin become likely.

Bitcoin doesn't need changes; it needs general light maintenance, so just maintain it, don't change it!

x.com/adam3us/status…

Where do the *sickos* get all their time/money to set up this elborate attack/system to hide their data? I'm thinking there is not that much to be gained for them longterm in this area. Most (ballparking here, 99.99%?) of humans arent into sicko stuff.

Eventually all nonfinancial data uses get price out. Those that make it - over say 5-10 years - must be providing some value to humans. Doubt sicko data maxis will make it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

They don't have to be real sickos, they can be state attackers, then they come after us with the public on their side

Additionally to what nostr:nprofile1qqs044j5pj8jl54pdgjapkpdm9wnhttcjr2rt5tfppy2pfma9zp6g3cpremhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet59uqjvamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3dwfjkccte9ecxs6tvd9cxxunfwd6xjctwduhxxmmd9ufzexy4 said, a main point in the post is the fact that it doesnt need to even get in a block. The CSAM would be willingly broadcasted by core 30 nodes around the network before ever accuring a fee because it would be held in the mempools. There is no "pricing it out" at that point and would require a filter to get rid of. Funny enough, that already exists...

Yes, I think I get this. In fact, in order to *filter* something, you have to *look for it* My node sees a provably unspendable op_return output from a TX and depending on the threshold, currently 83 bytes or less, sends TX to other nodes. But it has to *look* to see if its 83 bytes.....

What if someone shows up at your work/home and starts playing a horrible + illegal video/audio of something? Most likely people would *look* realize its terrible and throw the guy out, call the cops, shoot the guy.....

Is the person then at risk of *looking* at said illegal thing? What if its an email attachment? or an OP_Return data blob?

Seems like logic and common sense would prevail in these settings.

I agree. Intent matters. In the analogy you presented, the Core node wouldnt kick the person our of their house. They would take a picture of it on their phone so they have a copy and send it to their neighbors. And if somebody won the town raffle, the image would get displayed at townhall forever (blockchain). Sorry, I kinda had fun with that lol

The various state actors who want to stop all forms of self sovereignty, will use any tool or weapon to break their opposition. We fight against powers and principalities...

Or many of the individual state actors will personally start stacking bitcoin......

Then the state will have a hard time *politically* and logistically sustaining an effective longterm *attack plan*