The concept of a “platform” on the internet is a holdover from a time when computing and storage was expensive, bandwidth was scarce, and you needed to build economies of scale to make things like social networking viable.

We now live in a world where computing and storage are cheap, bandwidth is plentiful and the economies of scale for these things have overflown and the water of unutilized excess capacity is just pouring all over the ground.

Add the rise of artificial intelligence to the mix, and it’s really not that hard to see where things are going — a complete renegotiation of the fundamental assumptions of the human-computer interface, and ultimately the shape of the internet itself.

But if you’re still thinking about building a business atop the notions of what I call “platform thinking”, you’re going to get slaughtered in the next 5-10 years. This truly is a moment of all assumptions breaking down.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Keen observation

#[0]

Agreed 💯.

Been thinking about business evolution a lot because of this 🟠🟣.

I think a lot of people make the mistake of thinking about decentralization purely in political and moral terms. The truth is, you can see this future purely through the certain reallocation of underutilized resources within the global computing infrastructure (for which I include client devices in that definition) and the degree to which economic efficiencies can be gained.

You put it in a nutshell

Content life cycle management . With the right platform you can build all the apps you need or want and have them all work together

Protocol > platform

How about a platform with an object model that can transmit on many protocols ?

This was the dream of web services in the early oughts! But the incentives of platformization meant it never quite materialized. The technologies we are developing now will change those incentives.

Hi. How do you define “platform thinking?” What would be the alternative?

I’m asking because I’m not tech savvy and you seem to be making an interesting point but I don’t think I understand it.

Your using the alternative right now.

A protocol?

*You're.

So you're saying that a platform has for objective to "capture" users.

vs a protoctwhich has for objective to add value to users?

Or, am I getting this wrong?

I wouldn’t put it in those terms, no. I think platforms added value, in the sense that they provided a means to connect with other people on a common substrate, and engage in a form of communication that was simply not possible before.

It’s also true that the rise of social media platforms happened at a time, where computing resources and bandwidth on the internet was not really in a place where it was economically viable to do so in a full distributed way.

But like with all periods of creative destruction in the market, there is a period where the old paradigm becomes stuck in how people think about the world, and when those incumbents start doing everything they can to resist the coming change (through anti-competitive business practices, regulatory capture, etc). Eventually the dam breaks and change comes all at once.

True.

Glad to be part of the change.

🟣⚡

I found this definition on the internet:

An online platform is a digital service that uses the Internet to facilitate interactions between two or more separate but interdependent users (whether they are companies or private individuals). Platforms are places where demand and supply meet electronically.

And I found this table. Is this what you mean by platform?

:(

I think the improvement you are talking about is shifting to fully distributed ways of doing things?

This 💯

#[0]

Gonna zap that. And follow. 🫂☀️💜

This post deserves a zap of appreciation!

#[0] I think he is right.

This is interesting. Please elaborate further. How exactly does “platform thinking” breakdown and what do you see replacing it?

🎯

感慨,5年前“平台思维”“平台革命”还是年度热词。相关书籍多到泛滥。

5-10年内拥有这种思维的人将被“无情猎杀”。

Just keep learning. 别掉队,起码知道未来可能怎么死。⚡️

#[0]

I disagree. Platform thinking will remain important due to network effects. While protocols like nostr reduce those, they’re not going away and will remain important. e.g. even Damus will continue to benefit from network effects though not to the same degree as Facebook did.