You can put any size of round rock in the sky at any distance, and you will always clearly see the whole object - the shaded part will just be darker.
This is obvious and easily repeatable by real-life experiments...yet people throw this logic out the window when it comes to cosmology and the actual world we live in.
That's NASA propaganda for you.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
that’s great
Sometimes is based, sometimes is shit.
Positional vision and more light exposure. Do you say "that field should be clearly visible but it's not!" When it's foggy? What is fog? Just water vapor.
Now think, you put yourself in absolute black dark. Take a flashlight put it on one side of the room and hold up a cue ball. You won't be able to see anything the light beam doesn't show.
Nasa fakes shit all the time, not the shit I see in the sky.
Is this a joke? Not a serious argument by any means. And yes, I have seen the whole sphere of the crescent moon. Multiple times in fact!
Oooh do you have a photo? I would love to see it. I have never seen that!
No I never took a picture, didn’t expect that the shape of the moon would ever be controversial
Ben, research https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering
also, during night the dark side is visible. 🌒
True and not true. It depends on the combination of lighting and atmospheric circumstances. Those who understand both would never post this. Neither would the consistently observant who have noticed you can actually see the shadowed side on occasion due to these circumstances.
Yeah same thought on this note. I'm all for conspiracy but this concept just is a no for me.
The blue light (rayleigh scattering) of the sky is a foreground object to the moon, where it is a background for the pingpong ball. The sun acts as nearly a point source as light for the moon, where the reflections of sunlight from the surface also illuminate the pingpong ball. This gives the pingpong ball a noticable different lighting over the blue light background of Earth's atmosphere.
