That's an absurd statement and I don't get how someone actually unwraps that in their head and doesn't reach the same conclusion... What does "not ready for good UX" even mean? If he was saying it doesn't *have* good UX yet, then ok, but it suggests that this is exactly what we should focus on. But "not ready for"? What would qualify something that *was* "ready for" better design?

If a door that only opens inward so that you should pull the handle, was implemented with a push bar instead, thus intuitively making ever poor sap who uses it push first... at what point is the door "ready" to have that problem fixed? How long do we have to wait before the door is mature enough to allow us to fix a problem?😂