Ok
I'm not contesting that BOLT12 is a big privacy upgrade for lightning, but for the best possible privacy I'm not interested in:
-having to run my own LN node and managing channels
-needing to lock up money to receive money in the first place
-STILL needing to coinjoin before/after opening/closing channels
-IP address being vulnerable by default (Monero is protected from others on the network by default with dandelion)
-can be force closed against your will leaking even more data on-chain
Even if you choose to use a public node on Monero they can't see shit about the transaction.
Compare that with: BOLT12 LSPs still know some details about payments i.e. payment amount, timelock details, payment hash. This makes it vulnerable to statistical analysis because of this (the whole reason Monero is replacing ring sigs with FCMPs for sender privacy)
Most LN users use custodians because of the painful UX, a small fraction use LSPs, a fraction of that fraction run their own node and get the full benefits of BOLT12.
Despite all that shit I'm still open to also using BOLT12 when it gets more adoption and if it does what it says in practice. Forgive me for being a little wary after the over-hype and over-promising of lightning by every loud voice in the space.

https://zapalytics.com/