New UN report claiming mining is a “powerful tool” for money laundering makes zero sense and will be used an excuse to push KYC/AML/Sanctions at miner level – Full story at end of this post.

First, it claims that criminals use “illegal” mining operations to launder money, which literally defeats the entire purpose of money laundering.

Money laundering is done best via businesses that generate quick cashflow – at current hashprice, even if you *did* have free electricity and a all-in hosting cost of 0, one ASIC generates a mere return of ~$6000 over the course of 24 months.

This is particularly true in the fucking LIBYAN DESERT where heat and dust contribute significantly to wear and tear, but I’m sure that the geniuses who wrote this report also take their laptops to the beach.

The amount of nonsense the UN has cooked up here is truly astonishing.

It claims illegal mining operations are hard to detect, which is not just untrue for stealing electricity from the grid, but also for the heat signatures such operations omit.

If you do want to make such operations undetectable, facilities need to be impossibly insulated on the one hand – further diminishing returns on investment – but you also need to utilize off-grid energy.

If these operations use off-grid energy, which the UN names as a power source, then they do not, by definition, contribute to “chronic power outages in Lybia [..] depriving essential services and residential areas”, which the UN also claims, because *they are not connected to the grid*.

An exception to this would be if Bitcoin miners utilized stolen fuel, but then the issue is *people stealing fuel*, not people mining Bitcoin. This further erodes the UN’s claims that Lybia is an attractive destination for “illegal miners” due to low electricity cost, because stolen electricity is *not paid for by definition*.

As widely reported, Lybia’s fuel shortage arises from vibrant black markets. This does *not* happen due to a lack of “anti-money laundering authorities”, or because “bitcoin miners are stealing all the energy,” but because political tensions in the country have ground entire industries to a halt.

If you want to stop people from stealing electricity, maybe next time don’t bomb an entire country back to the Stone Age. You’re welcome.

Full Story: https://www.therage.co/un-mining-money-laundering/

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Everytime we pump the FUD cannon starts up again 😭

It's never wise to expect anything sensible from the UN

Looks like these clowns try it this time with a new narrative.

It’s such a crappy report. One that spends 90% of its words looking at gambling, fraud syndicates and money laundering in East Asia, which is an age old thing and arguably a problem (human trafficking etc) and then suddenly drops in mining - one of the crappiest forms of money laundering and then throws in a bunch of Chinese miners based in Libya. I can almost guarantee these are construction labourers trying to make a tiny bit of extra cash on the side. Very poorly researched and pure FUD especially concerning Libya. If it was so profitable, I also guarantee that every Libyan national would be mining and taking advantage of their own cheap electricity.

"The geniuses who wrote this report also take their laptops to the beach" LMAO 😄

LOL the most idiotic thing to name "mining BTC" a money laundering scheme. How can you "launder" money, if you just create them with PoW?

It’s very low time preference money laundering.

GM

These bastards, as always, those in the government, have been corrupting millions of dollars for millennia, their faces are shameful.

Mining is part of a great advancement and process, on the contrary, it helps a lot!

"but I’m sure that the geniuses who wrote this report also take their laptops to the beach" 😂😂

People still listen to the UN? Lmao

If we can make them as common as appliances in modern households, like internet routers, we could build a global, unstoppable hashrate.

A ONU está tratando mineradores de Bitcoin ou outras criptos como ilegais lavando dinheiro.

Por isso, tomem cuidado, evitem espalhar pra pessoas próximas que vocês mineram ou tem bitcoin.

nostr:nevent1qqs845gv2je003q97dmaazpw5has32dzzghxsr5ml227zplstcw93nqpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtczyrv2dm8scwtw428hnfzf0l5mwlwfwa3ng50nefwxxn3qsev3zej8kqcyqqqqqqg939xkn

PROOF OF WORK IS MONEY LAUNDERING

WAR IS PEACE

LOVE IS HATE

ENJOY THE NOISE

1984 is back!

The UN is a powerful tool for money laundering.

It doesn’t make zero sense that miners can be used for money laundering?

Unless I have misunderstood this (which happens..) a large mining operation can launder funds by creating a self-transfer transaction with an unusually high fee and broadcasting it only to their own mining node. In this setup, the transaction sends funds from one address the miner controls to another, while most of the value is assigned as a miner fee. Because the transaction is never propagated to the network, only the miner’s own node sees it, ensuring that no other miner can include it in a block and claim the fee.

Once the miner successfully mines a block, they include this high-fee transaction alongside regular mempool transactions. The excessive fee is then paid back to the miner as part of the block reward, effectively converting tainted funds into what appears on-chain as legitimate mining income.

I don't understand. UTXO's resulting from a tx in a hidden block will not be accepted by other miners as inputs when included in a newly found block. So this new block will be rejected globally. That is what I would think.

But I am curious to more details, of how this actually might work.!

I don't understand. UTXO's resulting from a tx in a hidden block will not be accepted by other miners as inputs when included in a newly found block. So this new block will be rejected globally. That is what I would think.

But I am curious to more details, of how this actually might work.

I don’t think it would be rejected. The original UTXO (input) would be known to the network, but the transaction with the high fee would not (until mined into a block).

I’m not saying this is a foolproof way to launder money, as it would be visible to network analytics that abnormally/suspiciously high fees are used.

This is what fear looks like.

The The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime is afraid.

nostr:nevent1qqs845gv2je003q97dmaazpw5has32dzzghxsr5ml227zplstcw93nqvjt9sz