This is concerning.
Discussion
Why's he sending lawyers after people too?
What can be done about it?
👀
Man, just when it was all looking like we’d all get grlfrnds 😖
This is what makes me paranoid of the covenants talk. It is made to seem that talk has arisen naturally, when it could easily have been schemed behind close doors.
John Carvalho is right when it comes to how cautious we should be in changing bitcoin, and not running the latest version of core until absolute certain
This is what makes me paranoid of the covenants talk. It is made to seem that talk has arisen naturally, when it could easily have been schemed behind close doors.
John Carvalho is right when it comes to how cautious we should be in changing bitcoin, and not running the latest version of core until absolute certain
This is what makes me paranoid of the covenants talk. It is made to seem that talk has arisen naturally, when it could easily have been schemed behind close doors.
John Carvalho is right when it comes to how cautious we should be in changing bitcoin, and not running the latest version of core until absolute certain.
What? Not good
Do not do this to me
wait - what?! this doesn't sound good
👁️👁️
As a left-of-curve pleb who isn't familiar with the parties in the discussion, I find the non-specific nature of theariard's accusation against the mentioned PRs unconvincing. However, the issue of backchannel merges is still concerning. Its the same as transactions bypassing the mempool.
#Bitcoin bulls are setting their sights on $69K highs ahead of the April halving🚀
Do you think you'll get to 69k by April?
If you haven’t Join the RB VIP group already, I would highly recommend joining now https://t.me/+7VPgqXtSUJo1MmRk,super underrated newsletter and extremely 100x pump signals OG Bitcoiners, join now to change the dynamic with us. 
Bitcoin can fork and get a new dev team can't it? Easier said than done, I'm sure.
nostr:note10vmp6h2gl86rv4h660yyxx7ezfj800f9atpn66pfuzlmrm0x6zgscu3ygv