Then we can agree on a lot. I just think the state is a far bigger threat to both humanity and earth. Without states and their corruption, most things which harm the environment would have been solved long ago or never been avproblem to begin with.

Two examples : oil and farming. If you want cleaner cars, then stop subsidizing oil and car companies - that only pays them **_not to_** innovate. In the US, we even had several decades of legal action specifically to shut down more efficient cars. If the state had simply not violated peoples' rights, there would be nothing to mandate and "fix." Farming is another absurd scapegoat, especially the livestock and monocultures. The way people farmed before industrialization was fine - possibly even good for the earth. Lyndon Johnson - an american president - literally told farmers to "get big or die" - which meant buy the seeds the government wanted, incorporate and play the financing game, plant monoculture, fertilize and spray, and all the rest. Our government then offered subsidized loans (less interest at taxpayers expense) only for farmers who planted specific monoculture crops, and then made that GMO shit when that came around. The whole thing is just corruption. And they'll say all kinds if stupid bullshit that amounts to, "look over there!" to keep people all worked up over the wrong things and never addressing the real problem - which is the government.

Basically they create problems, including pollution, by being so corrupt, then use the crisis they created to give themselves more power. And more power comes at the expense of people's rights.