Wikifreedia 0.0.3 released!

MERGE SUPPORT!

Now you can easily fork someone's wiki entry and, if you want them to take your changes, ask to merge them in.

I explain it more thoroughly in this video with a *special* silent guest in the background.

In the video Alice writes an article and White Rabbit makes a new version with some changes and gets Alice to update her copy with these changes.

White Rabbit. satisfied with these new changes, deletes his version and signals to his followers that he agrees with Alice's version.

https://flare-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/u/fa984bd7dbb282f07e16e7ae87b26a2a7b9b90b7246a44771f0cf5ae58018f52/video/mqm3-wlmqxu-9GW2nk5pg.mp4

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Kata KLYS MIA WHITE

WATCH ME

IM THE WHITE RABBIT

πŸ‡

SEEK WITHIN YOURSELF

DONDE ESTABLISHED

WWW = 99:1

Could there be an archive for different versions even if the changes are approved; with the differences in each one highlighted?!

yes, I'm waiting for a change in the protocol because we're making this better throughout all event kinds (so no more losing your follow list or other such things)

once we have that at the protocol I'll add revision history πŸ˜€

is there a PR or proposal where I can learn more about the protocol change?

Legend

Thank you... zapped. Will it still be 'supported by' White Rabbit after the pull request is merged if post-edits have been made by Alice?

Yes, but White Rabbit is indicating exactly what revision he indicated support of, so if Alice does a malicious modification White Rabbit can prove exactly what he expressed support of

was http://fed.wiki your inspiration?

best App on Nostr nostr:note1065kfuwvjcttf2ay5jhtyannz86eq32egnkkhvp0dmpvtw3evmqsyphz44

Finally took long enough

Jk thanks πŸ’œ

good stuff πŸš€

very cool!

When White Rabbit suggested the additional text, Alice had the opportunity to edit his suggestion. If she were to do that, does White Rabbit have the opportunity to see the edits and possibly withdraw his support for the merge?

Over a year ago now I asked nostr:npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc on stacker news why Wikipedia is seemingly struggling with the β€œValue for Value” model.

He provided a thoughtful response here:

https://stacker.news/items/98781/r/Lemon?commentId=99064

In that reply he offered β€œprogrammatic V4V splits” as a reward mechanism for posts on Wikipedia. I think this is the project he had in mind.

Please look into adding zaps so we can reward people for their research efforts into the articles they write. And consider adding splits for co-authors/merges.

Keep crushing πŸ‘Š

I can confirm this works well. My only regret is not drawing a picture of a penis for Alice and asking for pics of bobs and vagene.

Alice's Adventure in Wonderland*