My friend is now actively seeking a new lawyer to defend his interests. The one he has now is dismissive of his convictions and trying to drop him.

If anyone knows of someone getting a court to make minor changes to the wording of official documents for the sake of a person’s religious views, please get in touch with me.

#asknostr #law #lawyer #legal nostr:note1p4rdg4hrf0dcl8mvpu9rxa9xcguk5347ajls4xv5wqvhuc7aj6aqg9ug5w

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The could look into Legalshield. They may be able to help.

https://www.legalshield.com/

Good luck, hope you find someone. The right alignment is challenging sometimes, but I’m sure it’s possible to resolve with the right help.

It sounds like your friend is applyingΒ law in a legal setting that is acting umlawfully. Most attornies know the legal system, and almost nothing about law.

Finding someone knowlegable in law to represent your friend is going to be a challenge.

However, if he's hired a lawyer, that lawyer is obligated to act as your friend's agent. This means the lawyer must act in the same way your friend would. Not doing so is illegal, and actionable. If the lawyer refuses to act in your friend's stead, your friend can claim misrepresentation, dereliction of duties, or other similar objections.

If successful, this would give him time to find someone that understands law, and how it usually superscedes anything that is "legal".

Caveat: at a certain point, a lawyer sometimes has to tell you something is impossible, or give you news you don’t want to hear about your options.

We’re not totally convinced this has really gotten there yet. The lawyer SEEMS to just be tired of dealing with this situation.

Lawyers often think the possible isn't possible.

In modern day, lawyers are taught to think within the legal bubble, and to ignore law, in the same way that doctors are trained to think within the pharaceutical bubble, and ignore health.

What's the situation? It's unusual for the Court to compel a signature on anything because a signature typically represents assent to the contents of the document and if they don't agree with the contents why would they sign? More detail would be helpful, not that I can give remote legal advice but I might be able to point you in the right direction.

It’s a lot to post; can I DM you?

Sure, gift wrapped dms are preferred (i.e. through 0xChat) but either way

0xChat is cool. Sent, thank you!

Responded

🀝

Hi, Eryn; just saw this.

https://brownstone.org/author/dean-broyles/

https://broyleslaw.com/

Dean is a wonderful, humble believer who I've known for several years.