Monero is scarce. It's limited in supply at any moment AND under demand.

I think you're confusing me with someone else. That was my first comment in this thread I have no clue what you're talking about claiming I was going to give a "refutation"

If you're the economics guy please leave the Monero talk to me because you clearly have zero clue. A standard ring size is now enforced by the protocol and has been for a very long time. There are no 0-mixin transactions. And all this long defunct criticism only ever applied to sender privacy.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

yeah my bad, since I was asking someone specific questions I assumed they were responding not someone not even in the conversion.

the point made earlier was that 0-mixin coins still exist and therefore reduce the privacy of future transactions with those coins. either way, I don't care about that shitcoin and I am tired of talking about it. have a good one.

Dude everyone responds to everyone unsolicited. It's Nostr. You did so yourself under Simplified Privacys thread. But whatever its fine.

All those old 0-mixin coins have to do (which had to be done manually and intentionally by those users in the first place) is make a single transaction and their sender privacy is no longer exposed.

Hi, that’s probably me y’all are talking about I was at my fiat job.

I’ll reply when I get home 👍.

Earned a follow