Okay, leave the economic definitions to me. Scarcity is based on supply not demand. Just because I have only made one painting due to the demand of one customer doesn't mean the painting is scarce as I can create as many as I'd like with the rising demand. Monero is not scarce.
Secondly, you said you would give your reasoning with your refutation. Out of date isn't a reason. Which fork of Monero has fixed all of these issues? Specifically the 0-mixin Txns that are identifiable.
Monero is scarce. It's limited in supply at any moment AND under demand.
I think you're confusing me with someone else. That was my first comment in this thread I have no clue what you're talking about claiming I was going to give a "refutation"
If you're the economics guy please leave the Monero talk to me because you clearly have zero clue. A standard ring size is now enforced by the protocol and has been for a very long time. There are no 0-mixin transactions. And all this long defunct criticism only ever applied to sender privacy.
yeah my bad, since I was asking someone specific questions I assumed they were responding not someone not even in the conversion.
the point made earlier was that 0-mixin coins still exist and therefore reduce the privacy of future transactions with those coins. either way, I don't care about that shitcoin and I am tired of talking about it. have a good one.
Dude everyone responds to everyone unsolicited. It's Nostr. You did so yourself under Simplified Privacys thread. But whatever its fine.
All those old 0-mixin coins have to do (which had to be done manually and intentionally by those users in the first place) is make a single transaction and their sender privacy is no longer exposed.
Hi, that’s probably me y’all are talking about I was at my fiat job.
I’ll reply when I get home 👍.
