the moral case for separating the return on natural resources from that on other assets is that the former pre-exist human efforts

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

their value depends on human input. not on their owners

city land values rise over time due to community efforts and public investment benefiting landowners without their effort

imaging you bought your home 50 years ago in SF

your home is worth much more now

not because of anything you did

itโ€™s the result of the efforts of all those who contributed to making SF richer. including (of course) the public at large through their taxes

taxing land rent is crucial as credit fuels land ownership, turning rents into unproductive debt and risky bubbles

raising land tax to 5.55% while cutting capital and labor taxes could boost output 15%

tax unearned land rent more. work and capital less

problem: the political power of landowners

solution: BITCOIN BANK

true progress means lifting everyone-losers compensated. winners multiplied

few policies can achieve this

let's be brave and do it

How does any of this justify the morality of taxation? Taxation is still theft.

nevent1qqsg3pazj5zn9j32er5xzlsj0dqs79q8yn4ur4xm7xnvzf5gr6ekmgcpyfmhxue69uhkummnw3ez6an9wf5kv6t9vsh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet56urjxv

nevent1qqs0pqg4lm86cx35ksk4nelyy33ea8jc3r0hqzl83gvg8ep2rlrnutsprdmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuumhd9ehxtt9de5kwmtp9e3ksa6epyh

I still donโ€™t understand how that gives humans the right to steal from other humans.

taxes as a donation are not theft

voluntary taxation

why do philanthropists do philanthropy?

We are going in circles. You cannot just change the meaning of words. If we are talking about something voluntary, we are talking about a donation, not a tax. In which case I agree with you, government should be funded 100% voluntarily. If we are talking about mandatory taxation, you cannot use the word voluntary. Either use the words in ways that make sense, or we cannot have a rational discussion. Saying nonsense and then linking long form articles that do not explain what you are saying is not a rational discussion.

read it

nevent1qqs2w63rqllzxl6lvxwjkcdfxx9u7wf2g9ypp7u7gdesvfmstnxnj7cpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet5xg4stc

I did. It describes a system of taxation where you choose how much tax to pay, and then you are forced to sell your property. if you choose not to pay you lose your property.

Doesnโ€™t sound voluntary to me.

How is this enforced? Via the violence of the state?

new INTERPOL

No thanks but good luck to you and your taxes. I will continue to advocate for voluntarism.

i advocate for voluntaryism

voluntaryism

You are confused. You want โ€œvoluntaryismโ€ enforced by mandatory taxation, property confiscation, an international police force, and state violence.

NO

voluntaryism =

natural rights. equality. non-coercion. non-aggression

nevent1qqs8u9t7cy3n0fgp4gv0gmtydvy4c5z8chee5uqsx7u9kmahan5a2vcpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9ws9hkdqa

nevent1qqs8p0590hutpqhuuzl4lpc2h2aats2avv4ad42msa728fahl0yq3ygpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wsexanfk