Sheesh, I didn't expect Core to shit the bed quite this hard.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

What does that mean?

What have happened?

from the mailing list: enabling nodes to set their node policy is apparently "distributed authoritarianism"

actually even worse, merely making a suggestion of how nodes could set their own policy is "distributed authoritarianism" because it may discourage consenting 3rd parties from transacting 🤨

Gunna need some more info here

Probably good that everyone begins to see that devs can be just as unhinged as any other internet nitwit.

Haven’t discerned the Jewish decentralized, ethnic,financial network nested in the Taproot Wiz/ Bitcoin Core™️ subculture.

Explains a lot. It’s there, but don’t take my word for it.

Was Satoshi Jewish? Awesome!

Dude, I love that knots exists as an alternative (I run it myself) but why you gotta hate on core? The more options the better. Does McDonald's hate on Burger King? Competition is good. Welcome to the free market.

This is distributed authoritarianism! 😂 😂 😂

Spook

What happened this time?

I am out of the loop on this one.

Have you or are you releasing a video about it?

the TMZ of bitcoin went after luke

There must be some way of dealing with this

Enforcing the current limits on OP_Return in new consensus rules

An alert to the other side that if they increase they will indirectly cause a fork...