I think Blossom is another example of how Nostr people really cannot think about scale. This can work in a small community with a small number of uploads, but when you scale this up to millions of users, you need massive moderation teams to protect yourself. It's a very naive way to design infrastructure in the current world of regulations and censorship.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

So we need millions of small blossom servers.

You are obsessed with scale. Why?

I would like these notes from tree about how shit Nostr is more if he suggested something better.

There are two options:

1) either accept centralization and that it will not be censorship-resistant and have a few large centralized providers

or 2) go the P2P route (IPFS, Filecoin, Arweave, etc.) and try to be fully censorship-resistant

Nostr seems to not want to go either route, pretending to be "censorship-resistant" but not really

So a third distributed route is not possible from your perspective?

blossom is a redundant cdn

But hey, the fact the reference in your event is not necessarily specific to a server and can be rehosted after the fact and won't die by default, is 'sooo stupid', apparently. 🤷‍♂️

We've been saying "everyone will run their own node/server" for 30 years. It never happens.

30 years!? How old are you?

But I agree with you on this one, that will not happen (soon).

Any suggestions?