News of a Knots hard fork is not true.

As usual Core supporters are pushing bullshit.

The desperation is real.

It went from losing ALL respect when you went full Core-tard.

To now this arrogant dishonest attitude taking it to a new level of despicable.

All the Core shills here in the Nosttr little pond have been exposed.

You are a guardian of centralized fiat.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I thought Core was the fork?

Arent they the ones changing shit?

No man, the changes in mempool policy are NOT A HARD FORK.

It’s still a point of disagreement.

This is pure gaslighting and psyop from the core side.

I guess I dont really care about the core infighting.

I run Knots.

Based

Luke hasn’t refuted the messages. We need full context around the conversation.

Why does β€œLuke Dashjr” have any impact on users disagreeing with Core changing default mempool policy in v30?

Knots is flagging disagreement with Core on policy, it’s not in support of Luke.

Well Luke maintains Knots… but yes we aren’t following Luke as the be all and end all leader.

Yes, but- all software and actors should be considered adversarial until verified.

I think that principle is missing from the logic of people who think attacking Luke will somehow impact the argument about default mempool policy.

True.

Even if there is an issue with Luke and his direction for Knots Core is backwards compatible.

So is knots.

Every update should be considered adversarial until proven otherwise.

says a random bot. gfy